Search for: "Intuit Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 724
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2023, 8:12 am
The judge bought hook line and sinker the counter intuitive premise that three gigantic wireless carriers, controlling most of the market, better serve consumers than two gigantic carriers battling two smaller, renegade carriers. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:12 am
The judge bought hook line and sinker the counter intuitive premise that three gigantic wireless carriers, controlling most of the market, better serve consumers than two gigantic carriers battling two smaller, renegade carriers. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
Way back in May, I cracked wise about the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) fictional “Bureau of Let’s Sue Meta,” noting that the commission’s proposal (really, an “order to show cause”) to modify its 2020 settlement of a consumer-protection matter with what had then been Facebook—in other words, a settlement modifying a 2012 settlement—was the FTC’s third enforcement action with Meta in the first half of 2023. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 8:04 am
Case Citation: Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v . [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
[Serial-blogging my recent article in the Journal of Free Speech Law] Previously, I blogged the abstract, introduction, Part I, and Part II of my new article, Taxing Nudity: Discriminatory Taxes, Secondary Effects, and Tiers of Scrutiny, which has just been published in the Journal of Free Speech Law. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:44 pm
Intuit, Intuit raised this argument as an affirmative defense to an administrative proceeding. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 9:13 am
See Apple Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:22 am
Thus, an equitable rescission claim, rather than a legal claim seeking out-of-pocket damages, had more intuitive appeal. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 12:25 pm
Intuit Inc., 675 F.3d 1302 (Fed. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 10:41 am
Client Earth and others pursuing a climate change agenda is perhaps the more intuitive, and “greenwashing” type claims against companies that have set targets for improvement and (allegedly) failed to meet those aspirations[v] are also common. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 11:15 am
Worse yet, your spouse is paid $15,000 a month working for Mum&Dad, Inc. a privately held company owned by, guess who? [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 6:57 am
SME Steel Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:37 am
Amazon.com, Inc., 2023 WL 4585362 (W.D. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 8:03 am
ClassPass Inc., 2023 WL 4544598 (N.D. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994). [read post]
31 May 2023, 9:05 pm
For example, Visa Inc. made an investment in Square, which was then a startup, on January 10, 2011, and on April 27, 2011, there was a news article that mentioned the formation of a partnership between Visa Inc. and Square. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:25 am
Through intuitive and powerful products, Rampiva reduces barriers and provides legal teams with the insights they require to help reduce costs and increase efficiency. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:33 pm
About Exterro, Inc. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 6:34 am
Next, the court concluded that if limiting access to data is irrational but for an anticompetitive purpose, the implication is “far from obvious or even intuitive. [read post]
