Search for: "Irons v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 3,147
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am by David Pocklington
Whilst the design of the proposed extension has changed since then (in a way which, ironically, attracts criticism from other objectors), the LPA informs me that its “core concerns” remain such that the proposals are “unlikely to gain planning permission” (9 November 2023) [7]. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:33 am by SHG
In Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:57 am by Gabriel Greif
(Big Oil’s insistence that the issue of setbacks is a state-level decision is ironic in light of their shady tactics to delay statewide setback bills through the referendum process.). [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm by David Kopel
A few days after the Supreme Court decided New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am by Adam Ziegler
We’d all been working for over a year on a contract that would make it possible, someday in the future, for everyone to have free and open access to all the official court decisions ever published in the United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
This iterative process continued in countries like India and China, each factory adding its own interpretation and modifications along the way.[17] Wiesner stated, “One thing we’re always so amazed by is the creativity that comes out of the half of the process when producing an object [in a factory]. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 12:54 pm by Josh Blackman
Ironically, the same judges that the Texas AGs are shopping for, the Judicial Conference is trying to divest of jurisdiction. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:17 am by Dennis Crouch
Ironically, the underlying Federal Circuit decision that Purdue sought to challenge, Purdue Pharma L.P. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 6:05 pm by Mark Ashton
Ironically, the opinion in this case informs us there was a better path and no one followed it. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Rachel Kleinfeld
Supreme Court had taken on new powers (in their case, the power of constitutional review) in the 1803 case, Marbury v. [read post]