Search for: "Irvine v. Irvine"
Results 21 - 40
of 887
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2023, 12:20 pm
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
City of Irvine (Gemdale 2400 Barranca Holdings, LLC, Real Party in Interest) (2023) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
” The facts of Irvin v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 2:42 pm
From Iloh v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
Interestingly, there are not any California law schools on the list, a cohort I had assumed might benefit most from the state’s difficult bar examination and perhaps a higher “wait and see” approach from prospective employers.Now, to schools more likely to be adversely affected.SCHOOLS LIKELY TO BE ADVERSELY AFFECTEDAt grad v. 10 monthMassachusetts-Dartmouth 33.9%, 47.5%Yale 89.2%, 89.2%Stanford 88.5%, 89.0%BYU 82.8%, 85.9%Northwestern 87.9%, 89.5%CUNY 36.1%,… [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
Interestingly, there are not any California law schools on the list, a cohort I had assumed might benefit most from the state’s difficult bar examination and perhaps a higher “wait and see” approach from prospective employers.Now, to schools more likely to be adversely affected.SCHOOLS LIKELY TO BE ADVERSELY AFFECTEDAt grad v. 10 monthMassachusetts-Dartmouth 33.9%, 47.5%Yale 89.2%, 89.2%Stanford 88.5%, 89.0%BYU 82.8%, 85.9%Northwestern 87.9%, 89.5%CUNY 36.1%,… [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
Again, focusing just on the existing USNWR “top 50” for now:POTENTIAL LOSERS, PEER CHANGE:UC-Irvine (20 v. 37)Washington (36 v. 49)Colorado (36 v. 49)UC-Davis (24 v. 37)Wisconsin (31 v. 43)Boston College (27 v. 37)Emory (20 v. 30)There are a few others in the middle of some interest, because near the top smaller variations matter more. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
Again, focusing just on the existing USNWR “top 50” for now:POTENTIAL LOSERS, PEER CHANGE:UC-Irvine (20 v. 37)Washington (36 v. 49)Colorado (36 v. 49)UC-Davis (24 v. 37)Wisconsin (31 v. 43)Boston College (27 v. 37)Emory (20 v. 30)There are a few others in the middle of some interest, because near the top smaller variations matter more. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 7:45 am
Jonathan Cervas (Carnegie Mellon University), Bernard Grofman (University of California, Irvine), & Scott Matsuda (New York Law School) have posted The Role Of State Courts In Constraining Partisan Gerrymandering In Congressional Elections on SSRN. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:57 am
The court in Bleistein v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:57 am
The court in Bleistein v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 2:58 pm
Related Cases: Maryland v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
In Tatel v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 3:19 pm
Holtermann v. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 6:32 am
For example, a 2015 Supreme Court case, Yates v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:00 am
Schoenmann v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 7:38 am
-v.-17-2022-.pdf The volume is edited by the remarkable Selma Moidel Smith, who at 103 years old is at long last retiring from her editorship of the journal. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 2:52 pm
Trump, California v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 11:40 am
In the post-Roe v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Wrestling with Religious Diversity, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
