Search for: "Irwin v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
Although Supreme Court had granted NYPD's cross motion, the Appellate Division reversed the lower court's ruling.Initially addressing NYPD's challenge to Petitioner's standing to maintain this action, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Fleisher v New York State Liq. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
The Court in cases like Irwin Toy Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 5:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 7:07 am
Meyer 4(2), pp. 91–112 Reconstructing the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to More Effectively Alleviate Food Insecurity in the United States Craig Gundersen, Brent Kreider, John V. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:31 am
Do recent changes to Schedule 7 powers make Beghal v United Kingdom moot? [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:53 am
They found support for this in a 1983 decision of the Court of International Trade in which the Court found that items (possibly incorrectly) described as "Vise Grips" were used to twist, or "wrench" items and, therefore, were classified as wrenches under the old Tariff Schedules of the United States.In Irwin Industrial Tool Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:20 am
Irwin, No. 07-56672, slip op. (9th Cir. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:17 am
In Irwin v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 9:14 am
Irwin v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 5:20 pm
” Barney argued that the court, in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am
It is however an established principle of Strasbourg jurisprudence that such a right does not extend so far as to impose a positive obligation on public authorities to disclose or distribute information (see Leander v Sweden (1987) 9 EHRR 433 or Roche v United Kingdom (2005) 42 EHRR 599). [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 8:12 am
It also noted that pursuant to Irwin v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 1:30 pm
It also examines the extent to which policy transfer is evident in the UK and Ireland in terms of emulating the United States in reacting to organised crime. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 8:13 am
Bouzari v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 7:18 am
" Simonian v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 5:09 am
Irwin, 2011 IL App (1st) 102765. [read post]
27 May 2007, 10:11 pm
Seth at Quizlaw tells us that; Section 6103 of Title V of the United States Code reads, in relevant part: (a) The following are legal public holidays: … Memorial Day, the las [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
He concluded that Plaintiff Simonian’s complaint adequately stated that Oreck (the who) had deliberately falsely marked (the how), the particular product (the what), the marking was current (the when), within the District and throughout the United States (the where). [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 1:03 pm
The court explains that under its precedent, including United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 9:17 am
The Leaders in Law monthly webinar series will feature interviews with notable attorneys who are advancing civil rights in the United States and across the world. [read post]
