Search for: "J R Express" Results 21 - 40 of 4,134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2010, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
However, J 8/80 [4] stated that “for the purposes of R 88 a mistake may be said to exist in a document filed with the EPO if the document does not express the true intention of the person on whose behalf it was filed” (i.e. the applicant). [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
References within the Extension Agreements to the EPC, in particular to the so-called period of grace under R 85a(2) EPC 1973 do not override this fundamental distinction. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
It expressed the opinion that the request should have been granted, in view of the special circumstances (first erroneous noting of loss of rights).When the ED refused this refund, the applicant filed an appeal.The Legal Board found the appeal to be inadmissible.The legal framework[2.1] One of the conditions of admissibility of the appeal is that the statement of grounds of appeal satisfies the provisions of A 108, third sentence, and R 99(2). [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The applicant paid only 80% of the filing fee and referred to R 6(3).On July 16, 2010, the RS informed the applicant that the filing fee had not been paid in full and that the requirements of R 6(3) were not fulfilled. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 12:47 pm by Sean Minahan
District Court, District of Kansas to block the restriction, but Judge J. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:40 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
This is the Law Offices of Jacob J Sapochnick: Find out what we do! [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:11 am by INFORRM
Quebec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse)Decision Date: October 29, 2021 The Supreme Court of Canada held that jokes made by a comedian—Mike Ward—at the expense of a famous, disabled child—Jérémy Gabriel—did not amount to a discriminatory violation of Mr. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 11:16 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  An attorney for J&J expressed confidence to Reuters that the verdict would be overturned on appeal. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As there was no counterpart to R 85a(2) EPC 1973 under the EPC 2000, the old rule had to be applied. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Certaines de ces capsules concernent Jérémy. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 8:55 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
Johnson and Johnson (J&J) the world’s largest pharmaceutical and medical device maker is hammered in another loss in the on going transvaginal mesh wars. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:31 pm by INFORRM
  The cases are as follows: R v BBC, ex parte Pro Life-Alliance [1997] EWHC Admin 316 Dyson J dismissed application for judicial review of a decision not to broadcast a party political broadcast made by the Pro-Life Alliance. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
J 7/82 and T 428/98), the cause of non-compliance is removed on the date on which the person in charge of the patent application (in the present case: the duly authorised professional representative) realizes that the time limit has not been met. [read post]