Search for: "J SQUARED, INC." Results 21 - 40 of 498
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
Notwithstanding complaints made, the company and its HR servicer allegedly failed to take appropriate action.Since such conduct was believed to be violative of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the EEOC filed suit against Surfeit Group LLC, Aged Artisans LLC dba Square Barrels and Altres, Inc. dba SimplicityHR (EEOC v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
For example, Visa Inc. made an investment in Square, which was then a startup, on January 10, 2011, and on April 27, 2011, there was a news article that mentioned the formation of a partnership between Visa Inc. and Square. [read post]
30 May 2023, 11:19 am by Patricia Hughes
Ontario (“Working Families II”), both decisions of Morgan J. in the Superior Court, and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
  For example, a strict regulation limiting SB 9 units to 800 square feet regardless of other standards would obviously limit the size of units bui [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Tax/Federal Court: Motions to StrikeIris Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
 Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 5 April 2023, Hill J ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s costs on an indemnity basis in the case of Rayney v Reynolds [No 4] [2022] WASC 360. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am by Dennis Crouch
WPL, the Federal Circuit squarely addressed the copyrightability question. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Andrew Lykiardopoulous KC and Henry Edwards of 8 New Square presented the patent case highlights of 2022 in the form of a delayed Christmas menu, ranging from Neo crackers to Optis turkey with secret sauce. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am by Ryan Goodman
Briggins, 50 N.Y.2d 302, 309, 428 N.Y.S.2d 909, 406 N.E.2d 766 (1980) (concurring opinion) (Jones, J.). [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
In any event, respondent was entitled to submit the affidavit on its cross motion, and the court properly considered it in evaluating the merits of petitioner's claim (see Basis Yield Alpha Fund [Master] v Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 115 AD3d 128, 134-135 [1st Dept 2014]; see also Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275 [1977]). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
In any event, respondent was entitled to submit the affidavit on its cross motion, and the court properly considered it in evaluating the merits of petitioner's claim (see Basis Yield Alpha Fund [Master] v Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 115 AD3d 128, 134-135 [1st Dept 2014]; see also Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275 [1977]). [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
” As media outlets reported at the time, the seizure was the third major step “taken [in recent months] in connection with an escalating federal investigation into efforts by several close allies of former President Donald J. [read post]