Search for: "J. J. and W. J. v. J. B. and J. B." Results 21 - 40 of 1,743
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2024, 8:08 am by Alessandro Cerri
These facts were borne from evidence which the High Court was entitled to accept; andOn due cause, the Court found (with some difficulty) that there was no error of law or principle in the High Court judge applying Julius Sämann Ltd v Tetrosyl Ltd [2006] EWHC 529 (Ch), in which Kitchin J had observed that the test for showing due cause is "relatively stringent" - in other words it is not enough to show that a sign has been innocently adopted, there must be something… [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
The expert witness at issue was an economist, Glen W. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
Here are a few preliminary thoughts about the Court’s decision yesterday in Trump v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Klara Nedrelow
South Africa contends that Israel has commissioned acts capable of falling within Article II (a), (b), (c), and (d) of the Genocide Convention by “killing Palestinians in Gaza, causing them serious bodily and mental harm, and inflicting upon them conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
The plaintiff then filed a Rule 60(b) motion to set aside the judgment, claiming that the undisclosed evidence amounted to fraud and misrepresentation. [read post]