Search for: "JACKSON et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al"
Results 21 - 38
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2025, 6:37 pm
GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERALBRIAN FIREBAUGH, ET AL., PETITIONERS24–657 v.MERRICK B. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:42 am
In denying review of a petition in Jackson, et al., v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
In the Tristangate case, Stati et. al. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 2:34 pm
Designated Case No. 1:20-cv-01909-BAH, AFL-CIO, et al., v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Jackson (1969) (being a sampling of his judicial opinions). [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:10 am
(Copyright Litigation Blog) Columbia law expert on telecom, copyright to FTC (IP Watch) US Copyright – Decisions District Court C D California confirms no fair use exception to digital lock provisions under the DMCA: USA v Matthew Crippen (IP Osgoode) District Court E D Texas: Another Texas judge scrutinises mass copyright litigation: Steve Hardeman LLC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
The Commission is a body created under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 (Act), as amended, 18 U.S.C. 3551 et seq. (1982 ed., Supp. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2025, 5:10 pm
(ACLU Explainer and Virtual Press Release, TikTok Inc., et al. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm
Massey Coal Company, Inc., et al. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 1:29 am
BBC, CNN, WSJ, FT, Politico, Daily Mail, AP News and Al Jazeera covered the ruling. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
§9601 et seq. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
§9601 et seq. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
