Search for: "JACKSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al"
Results 21 - 37
of 37
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2010, 9:43 pm
Jackson, EPA et al. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 11:29 am
Jackson, EPA et al. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
§9601 et seq. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
§9601 et seq. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am
At about 12:40 p.m., Chief Justice Warren began to read his opinion for the Court in Case Number One on that Term’s docket, Oliver Brown et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:07 am
At about 12:40 p.m., Chief Justice Warren began to read his opinion for the Court in Case Number One on that Term’s docket, Oliver Brown et al. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:27 pm
In Jackson, et al v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 8:15 am
District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, (DC Super. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm
Massey Coal Company, Inc., et al. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
WW, LLC, et al. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 9:31 pm
See District of Columbia et al. v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Texas, et al. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:33 pm
City of Akron, et al Northern District of Ohio at Akron 08a0260n.06 B & V Distr Co Inc v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
