Search for: "JAMES E. COOKE"
Results 21 - 40
of 278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2009, 2:56 pm
~James L. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:02 am
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[42] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 12:02 am
James Flett, When is an Expert not an Expert? [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:26 am
Ed. 2004). - James M. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:57 pm
AN OUTBREAK OF E. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[42] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 10:39 am
Cook all ground beef and hamburger thoroughly. [read post]
7 May 2009, 1:02 pm
The Solicitor General's Office has filed a brief in opposition to the petition for certiorari that was filed by James E. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 2:35 pm
Cook, Michael. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 10:02 pm
Looking back on his time at the the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, James “Bo” Reagan tends to focus on his work within the beef industry to help beat back the threat of E. coli. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 5:18 pm
James S. [read post]
21 May 2013, 10:01 pm
James Marsden, a food safety professor at Kansas State University, weighed into the debate on the industry trade publication Meatingplace this week. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am
It is for this precise reason that the USDA has repeatedly rejected calls from the meat industry to hold consumers primarily responsible for E. coli O157:H7 infections caused, in part, by mistakes in food-handling or cooking.[34] E. coli O157:H7 infection may lead to severe complications, both acute and chronic. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:37 am
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[42] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am
It is for this precise reason that the USDA has repeatedly rejected calls from the meat industry to hold consumers primarily responsible for E. coli O157:H7 infections caused, in part, by mistakes in food handling or cooking.[34] E. coli O157:H7 infection may lead to severe complications, both acute and chronic. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 5:24 am
Justice Joseph E. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:07 pm
It is for this precise reason that the USDA has repeatedly rejected calls from the meat industry to hold consumers primarily responsible for E. coli O157:H7 infections caused, in part, by mistakes in food-handling or cooking.[34] E. coli O157:H7 infection may lead to severe complications, both acute and chronic. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 9:02 pm
With four each, E. coli O113:H4 and E. coli O84:H20 were the most common. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:59 am
However, one major meat company has already introduced a raw ground beef product treated to eliminate E. coli O157:H7. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 4:24 pm
Restaurant owners frequently work in their own restaurants as cooks, bartenders, servers, etc. [read post]
