Search for: "JAMES v. HOLDER et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 83
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2018, 10:01 pm
Amazon.com LLC, et al, No. 17-cv-03820-JSW (MEJ) (N.D. [read post]
1 May 2018, 7:38 am
Visual Concepts, LLC et al, (No. 16CV-724) (S.D.N.Y. 2016) (https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.452890.1.0.pdf). [3]Jonathan Stempel, Lawsuit over LeBron James, NBA Stars’ tattoos in video games can proceed, Reuters Sports News (Mar. 30, 2018) https://www.reuters.com/article/us-take-two-lawsuit-nba-tattoos/lawsuit-over-lebron-james-nba-stars-tattoos-in-video-games-can-proceed-idUSKBN1H61MZ. [4] Noam Cohen, On Tyson’s Face, It’s… [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
He made this type of argument before to oppose changes in copyright that would provide rights holders tools to go after enterprises engaged in the business of piracy. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 7:40 am
Here are the amici curiae in the matter of Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Appellant James V. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 5:15 pm
An alternative approach that avoids these problems is the one developed by Judge James Robart in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
Holder, (Columbia Law Review, Forthcoming).Steven G. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
Thus, for instance, Cao, et al., Willingness to Shoot: Public Attitudes Toward Defensive Gun Use, 27 Am. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 8:32 am
(I saw James Grimmelmann added this to his Internet Law casebook. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 11:18 am
Feldman et al. count patent monetizers corresponding to CKS categories 2 through 5, and 7. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm
ATT Mobility, et al. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:44 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Shelby County v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Shelby County v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:31 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:46 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
