Search for: "JAS v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 213
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2016, 5:35 pm
JA asks for a written motion first. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 1:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 7:45 am
Let’s start with my former evidence professor, Paul Gianelli (a former Army JA). [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 7:45 am
Let’s start with my former evidence professor, Paul Gianelli (a former Army JA). [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 7:45 am
Let’s start with my former evidence professor, Paul Gianelli (a former Army JA). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
” United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 6:32 am
United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:31 am
The first and most important of those decisions is Ja’Chim Scheuing v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 11:33 am
Lindesay Low, Senior Legal Counsel at the Scotch Whisky Association, has shared his thoughts on the recent case of Viiniverla Oy V Sosiaali- ja terveysalan lupa- ja valvontavirasto. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:39 am
Though she worked about 10 hours a week, Nabors submitted claims to the Unemployment Insurance Division of the New York State Department of Labor (UID) stating that she was not working at all. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 2:26 am
(my emphasis) Her Honour had earlier quoted the good working rule in Shelfer which (in part) was: In my opinion, it may be stated as a good working rule that â€â [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:45 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 1:38 pm
Supreme Court case, Barnes v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 12:54 am
” JA at 267. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 8:46 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:27 pm
In Nudel v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:40 am
This morning Advocate General Cruz Villalón delivered his Opinion in Case C‑583/12 Sintax Trading OÜ v Maksu- ja Tolliameti Põhja maksu- ja tollikeskus, a request to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus, Estonia. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:02 pm
The plaintiff states in this case (like the ones in Biden v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 12:03 am
The court a quo relied on the approach of Harms JA in the Reckitt & Colman case, where Judge Harms said the following at pg 317:"In assessing whether there is a likelihood of deception or confusion it is necessary to consider the whole get-up of the appellant and the whole get-up of the respondent…but it is difficult to do this exercise without having regard to its individual parts." [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:46 am
ED refused on the basis of a stated practice not to sign letters of intent prior to the award of a prime contract. [read post]
