Search for: "JESS v STATE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 21 - 40 of 195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2012, 6:37 am by Kiran Bhat
Finally, the Department of Justice admitted yesterday that it inadvertently erred when, during the 2009 arguments in Nken v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:57 am by MBettman
Kasich; the state of Ohio; the Ohio Department of Health and its Director; the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services and its Director; the Ohio Medical Board and its members, (collectively, “the state” or “the State Defendants”) and the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor, who is only technically involved in this appeal. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
This morning, the justices will hear 80 minutes of argument in one of the term’s marquee cases, Department of Commerce v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am by Amy Howe
 Kali Borkoski rounded up early coverage of and commentary on Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
The justices decided in Shular v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
The justices held 8-1 in Pereira v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:56 am by Amy Howe
” At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Leslie Griffin discusses Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 5:34 am by Geoff Schweller
Executive Health Resources, Inc., concerns the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) ability to dismiss qui tam whistleblower cases in which it did not initially intervene. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 6:41 am by Edith Roberts
In The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin discusses the Justice Department’s effort to strengthen its case in Jennings v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
For The Wall Street Journal, Brent Kendall and Jess Bravin report that Husted v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 8:28 am by Melanie Fontes
By Adriel Cepeda Derieux* Late last month, the Supreme Court heard argument in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 2:22 pm by WSJ Staff
Justice Department lawyer Curtis Gannon said that apparent anomaly resulted from textual differences between the two statutes. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:30 am by Marissa Miller
Finally, at the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr weighs in on the first question presented in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Once this system takes hold, it forms a true equilibrium from which only oddball states (Maine and Nebraska) will depart. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 6:19 am by James Romoser
In the Twitter case, the Justice Department wants the court to review a ruling from the U.S. [read post]