Search for: "JESS v STATE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 21 - 40
of 195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2012, 6:37 am
Finally, the Department of Justice admitted yesterday that it inadvertently erred when, during the 2009 arguments in Nken v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:57 am
Kasich; the state of Ohio; the Ohio Department of Health and its Director; the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services and its Director; the Ohio Medical Board and its members, (collectively, “the state” or “the State Defendants”) and the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor, who is only technically involved in this appeal. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:35 am
New York City Department of Social Services. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
This morning, the justices will hear 80 minutes of argument in one of the term’s marquee cases, Department of Commerce v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am
Kali Borkoski rounded up early coverage of and commentary on Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 3:40 am
The justices decided in Shular v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 8:39 am
Following the opinion in State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
The justices held 8-1 in Pereira v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:56 am
” At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Leslie Griffin discusses Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 5:34 am
Executive Health Resources, Inc., concerns the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) ability to dismiss qui tam whistleblower cases in which it did not initially intervene. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 6:41 am
In The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin discusses the Justice Department’s effort to strengthen its case in Jennings v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
For The Wall Street Journal, Brent Kendall and Jess Bravin report that Husted v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 8:28 am
By Adriel Cepeda Derieux* Late last month, the Supreme Court heard argument in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 2:22 pm
Justice Department lawyer Curtis Gannon said that apparent anomaly resulted from textual differences between the two statutes. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:30 am
Finally, at the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr weighs in on the first question presented in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Once this system takes hold, it forms a true equilibrium from which only oddball states (Maine and Nebraska) will depart. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 6:19 am
In the Twitter case, the Justice Department wants the court to review a ruling from the U.S. [read post]
