Search for: "JOHN DOES I-V (A FICTITIOUS NAME)"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2022, 9:42 am
Va.) in Doe v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 5:30 pm
In the case of Johns v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 6:41 pm
Third, the GAB procedures for removing fictitious names might remove names that actual voters share with celebrities (i.e., an actual “George Clooney”) on the assumption that the name is suspicious, thus placing the burden on the recall committees to expend resources in order to verify the signature. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:01 am
I think that I, at least, have been informally seeing some indication of this since even before 9-11 [added: ;others might well think, as Alan Kaufman does in the comments, that this is not really the case and even perhaps, KA speaking again and not Alan, that John is extrapolating too much from his personal experience in the Bush administration being opposed by military lawyers]. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 11:45 pm
" Here's a paragraph from that section:Of course, the most extreme case of a pretext--based on the example I gave--is indeed that it may be totally fictitious. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:12 am
(I thought about including Washington v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 10:28 am
"John Doe Corp.," a fictitious name intended to represent entities or individuals whose actual identity is not currently known to Texas Roadhouse, was also listed as a Defendant. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 5:13 pm
” 750 ILCS 105/16(6) To keep court documents public and respect the privacy of people who deserve it, the Illinois statute allows you to file under fictitious names (usually John Doe or Jane Doe) “Upon application and for good cause shown the parties may appear under fictitious names. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
John W. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 10:52 am
It contains 14 counts, names 31 defendants, 10 "John Does" described as fictitious and unknown persons, and 10 "ABC Corporations" identified as fictitious and unknown entities. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
From Doe v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 11:43 am
After a John Doe lawsuit, Yahoo disclosed enough information to identify Hosto as the author, and Hosto confessed to the vendetta. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
The Court found that Regulation 3 does not carry the force of law (see Weiss v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:24 pm
Columbia Law School Professor John C. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:14 pm
” Afro-American Publ’g Co. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:01 pm
I’m not sure what else I can do.Peter Padilla: I SAID GOOD DAY! [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:01 pm
John Doe No. 3, 775 A.2d 756 (N.J. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 11:01 pm
John Doe No. 3, 775 A.2d 756 (N.J. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 4:04 am
Villarreal, 963 F.2d 770, 774 (5th Cir. 1992) (“[I]ndividuals may assert a reasonable expectation of privacy in packages addressed to them under fictitious names. [read post]
