Search for: "JOHN R. BUCHANAN"
Results 21 - 40
of 262
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2021, 12:32 pm
Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), Dina Titus (D-Nev.), John Katko (R-N.Y.), Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.), Vern Buchanan (R-Fla.), Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), Andy Barr (R-Ky.), Buddy Carter (R-Ga.), Paul Tonko (D-N.Y.), Donald Payne (D-N.J.), Guy Reschenthaler (R-Pa.), and Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), this version of the amendment is the one for which we advocated. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 4:05 pm
.), Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), Dina Titus (D-Nev.), John Katko (R-N.Y.), Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.), Vern Buchanan (R-Fla.), Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), Andy Barr (R-Ky.), Buddy Carter (R-Ga.), Paul Tonko (D-N.Y.), Donald Payne (D-N.J.), Guy Reschenthaler (R-Pa.), and Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), the version moving forward is the one for which we advocated. [read post]
11 May 2021, 9:24 am
Buchanan, Ph.D., John N. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 9:00 pm
Faced with a blizzard of illogical, strange, bad-faith arguments coming from Senate Republicans in advance of Donald Trump’s second impeachment trial, one might think that there has to be at least something to their arguments. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:02 pm
Farber, Judy Harrison, Allen R. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:00 am
[This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 8:28 am
First and foremost, Representatives Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) and Vern Buchanan (R-Fla.), co-chairs of the Congressional Animal Protection Caucus, quickly secured victory. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
The legal academy lost one of its finest scholars and teachers when Professor Deborah Rhode of Stanford Law School died on January 8, 2020, at the age of 68. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 6:09 am
is executed by electric chair.....John Dos Passos’ Manhattan Transfer introduced the cinematic narrative form to the novel. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Farber, Judy Harrison, Allen R. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Then, when John Bolton offered to testify, there was a flurry of Republicans publicly saying that the testimony should be heard, followed by dithering, quickly ending with “We don’t need to hear this at all, because we’re not going to convict him, no matter what. [read post]
7 Nov 2020, 10:37 pm
Harrison, Polk, Taylor, Pierce, Buchanan, and Lincoln. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:02 pm
For the past five years, I have been writing columns and giving speeches warning that Donald Trump is an existential threat to constitutional democracy. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm
Farber, Judy Harrison, Allen R. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Buchanan, With all due respect to your accomplishments… No, Sir. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Because he knows that he is going to try to use the courts to reverse the people’s verdict against him in this year’s election.Having another of Mitch McConnell’s pre-screened nominees on the Supreme Court—and to be clear, there is no reason that Senate Democrats should view Trump’s nominee as a flesh-and-bones human being, because McConnell certainly sees all of these people as interchangeable—could, indeed, make the difference in post-election litigation.I… [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 2:40 pm
Wodehouse Art Hinshaw Artnegotiates Arizona State Negotiation Dispute Resolution Zachary Kramer zachary_kramer Arizona State Kris Mayes krismayes Arizona State Steve Clowney steveclowney Arkansas-Fayetteville Property Race & the Law Land Use Stacy Leeds stacyleeds Arkansas-Fayetteville Property American Indian Law Legal Education Jill Lens jillwieberlens Arkansas-Fayetteville Torts Remedies Women & the Law Cynthia Nance Nancecy… [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 10:59 am
King, Deb Haaland, D-N.M., Schakowsky, McAdams, and John Katko, R-N.Y. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As Professor Neil Buchanan and I argue in a forthcoming Cornell Law Review article, the brand of textualism that the Court has endorsed is so far removed from the ostensibly determinate rule-bound approach that Scalia and others championed as barely to count as distinctive. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm
Indeed, what most commentators expected to fracture the justices in a 5-4 split along ideological lines, with a narrow victory for the conservative justices, was in fact a 6-3 decision with both Justice Gorsuch and Chief Justice John Roberts in the majority. [read post]
