Search for: "JOHNSON V COLUMBIA PROPERTIES"
Results 21 - 40
of 163
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2022, 9:21 pm
Her innovative case study on the Microsoft v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am
That was the clear message of the Court’s recent decision in Bostock v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 7:48 am
The Supreme Court in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
The case involved a First Amendment challenge to the denial of a tax exemption for a church-owned property occupied by a couple whom the church designated as its ministers. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 6:01 am
District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed the case, Atchley v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Johnson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Johnson v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm
Cotter, Nominal Damages—and Nominal Damages Workarounds—in Intellectual Property Law TransUnion v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 5:01 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:44 pm
The ACLU dispatched Hollace Ransdell, a Columbia-educated journalist, to investigate. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit’s extensive, published ruling eliminates property owners’ ability to recover for temporary property takings under any theory, and that ruling conflicts with decisions of other courts, including the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court needs to clarify the rules for recovery for temporary regulatory takin [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:57 am
Under current Supreme Court doctrine, Brandenburg v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
Subchapter V – Return to Work Reporting Requirement Employers have a method to report if an employee refuses to return to work Plain language about returning to work Subchapter VI – Other Related Provisions and Technical Corrections Pay an extra $100 per week to individuals who have at least $5,000 a year in self-employment income, but are disqualified from receiving Pandemic Unemployment Assistance because they are not eligible for regular state unemployment benefits. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am
” For the District of Columbia, over which the president exercises unfettered authority, he actually did so, but without any information about which troops were being deployed, or where: “As we speak, I am dispatching thousands and thousands of heavily armed soldiers, military personnel and law enforcement officers to stop the rioting, looting, vandalism, assaults and the wanton destruction of property. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s NLRB v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 5:00 pm
A recent decision, Geluch v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Department of Commerce (nikkikalbing@gmail.com) The Future of Law in British Africa on the Eve of IndependenceRabiat Akande, Harvard Law School (oakande@sjd.law.harvard.edu) Marginalizing "Secularism," Decolonizing the State: Missionary Advocacy for Religious Freedom in British Colonial Northern Nigeria, 1945-1960Terence Mashingaidze, Midlands State University, Zimbabwe (mashingaidzet@staff.msu.ac.zw) Constitutionalism and Ritual Controversies in a Zimbabwean Chiefdom,… [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
S. 304 (1987) (holding that a property owner acquires an irrevocable right to just compensation immediately upon a taking)[14], and a narrower reading of Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
