Search for: "JONES V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD"
Results 21 - 40
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2007, 5:59 am
Sapin (Merit Systems Protection Board)Commentator:Robert Herbst (Beldock Levine & Hoffman)10:45 a.m.-12:00 p.m.Part Six. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:36 am
This uncertainty was acknowledged by the Florida Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
In another article, the Newspaper reported on a letter to board members from one of the board members who had been removed. [read post]
18 May 2023, 8:01 am
The FDIC board acted based on the recommendation of an administrative law judge who was removable by the federal Merit Systems Protection Board only for cause; the MSPB is in turn itself removable by the president only for cause. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am
The appellate opinion merits a careful review, but a few initial definitions are in order. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 12:52 pm
Bobby Chesney explained a factual dispute related to the merits in Doe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 4:38 pm
Canada In the case of Subway Franchise Systems of Canada, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 9:36 pm
This is memorandum I wrote for an upcoming workers’ compensation Merit Hearing. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am
Pennsylvania School Boards Association, 20-1294. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
Last Week in the Courts On 26 February 2024, judgment on meaning was handed down in Hinds v British Boxing Board of Control Ltd [2024] EWHC 380 (KB). [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
The ICO has issued reprimands to Dover Harbour Board and Kent Police after they breached data protection law. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Department of Defense raises the question of what the consequences are if an employee seeking review misses the deadline to file a petition seeking review of an Merit Systems Protection Board decision under 5 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 5:26 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to review a final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board is jurisdictional. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 17-6054, Jones v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In Wilkes v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
Rizo, 18-272 Issues: (1) Whether—when the Equal Pay Act permits employers to pay men and women different wages for the same work “where such payment is made pursuant to (i) a seniority system; (ii) a merit system; (iii) a system which measures earnings by quantity or quality of production; or (iv) a differential based on any other factor other than sex,” 29 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
In reversing the judge, the Board found that the General Counsel did not adduce sufficient evidence of the factors traditionally relied on by the Board to support a single employer finding. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm
Judge Allison Jones Rushing dissented, saying that contemporaneous school board messages showed that the board wanted to racially balance admissions to reduce the prevalence of Asian Americans. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:14 am
v. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 1:39 pm
For a discussion of TSI's dubious affidavits and to view sample affidavits filed in support default or summary judgments, follow the link to -- > Robosigned affidavits by Transworld Systems Inc. [read post]
