Search for: "JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE"
Results 21 - 40
of 236
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2016, 10:35 am
Google, Inc. 15-849Issue: (1) Whether, in order to be “transformative” under the fair-use exception to copyright, the use of the copyrighted work must produce “new expression, meaning, or message,” as this Court stated in Campbell v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 7:04 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am
” (relisted after the June 13 conference) Dex Media Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 11:03 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In the 14-page unanimous per curiam ruling this week by a three-member panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 11:39 am
The highest-profile of the bunch is undoubtedly Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:11 am
Van Hook (09-144) United States Defense Department v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 9:42 am
On May 25, Judicial Watch also filed a lawsuit against the DOJ to obtain additional records related to the Dayton program after the DOJ failed to respond to a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm
Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am
Ritzen Group Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 17-6540, Orr v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
Lastly, United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm
United States, United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
(relisted after the October 26 conference) AT&T, Inc v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm
United States overruled United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am
NAACP, 18-588 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
Amgen Inc., et al., 15-1039 and Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am
Remember United States v. [read post]
