Search for: "Jack Whittington"
Results 21 - 40
of 114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2009, 3:46 pm
I argue that a theory of constitutional change that focuses on how the Constitution is implemented through institutions over time amid the tensions between the "written" and the "unwritten," the "legal" and the "political," offers a better approach to understanding the Bush presidency than the major alternative theories offered by Karl Llewellyn, Bruce Ackerman, Jack Balkin and Sanford Levinson, and Keith Whittington. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 4:12 am
Jack Hardison, who focuses on Workers’ Compensation cases, has also been selected to the 2024 North Carolina Super Lawyers List. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 9:08 am
In the room were the four leading advocates of construction — Keith Whittington, Randy Barnett, and Jack Balkin, along with Larry Solum — as well as one of the critics of construction (yours truly — for my criticism, see here). [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 1:47 pm
Rather than hear what I have to say on this subject, I invited SPU’s two terrific columnists, Rachel Rodgers and Jack Whittington, to discuss this article, law school Wallersteins and their own experiences in law school and after because they are in the thick of things. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 4:31 pm
I don't mean to task Jack and Sandy unduly - as I believe Jack notes, their theory is advanced on a much narrower front as an account of how doctrinal change occurs through political change. [read post]
7 May 2018, 7:09 am
Whittington Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Government Is Smarter, Second Edition by Ilya Somin The Upside-Down Constitution by Michael S. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 9:30 pm
Presidential Supreme Court Reform Commission Division: Princeton on Keith Whittington and three alumni (Heather Gerken, Rick Pildes, Bertrall Ross). [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
Whittington is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Politics at Princeton University. [read post]
24 May 2008, 6:35 am
Whittington emphasizes the role of politics in construction. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:30 am
I am utterly delighted to have three old-friends (and intellectual influences), Jack Balkin, Keith Whittington, and Kim Lane Scheppele, as the presenters of their own views about the problem. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 10:02 am
Hint: not Jack Goldsmith's The Terror Presidency (2007) or Charlie Savage's Takeover: The Return of the Imperial Presidency (2007). [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:18 am
Solove, Understanding Privacy (new in paperback) * Keith Whittington, Constitutional Construction Feel free to propose a review of any of the above books or any other recent books in Harvard University Press's catalog. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 3:19 pm
Yet Keith Whittington is obviously correct when he writes that “[I]nterpretive results are separate from interpretive methods. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:30 am
This has been a much listened to and talked about teleseminar Q & A with Rachel Rodgers and Jack Whittington. [read post]
21 May 2008, 7:02 am
Whittington emphasizes the role of politics. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 5:16 am
In recent years, originalists ranging from Jack Balkin to Keith Whittington to Randy Barnett have argued in varying fashion that an originalist interpretive approach follows logically from "our commitment to a written constitution. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:46 am
I’m with Jack in believing (as I take him to believe) that Anchor Originalism in any rigorous, pinched, across-the-board form is chimerical. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
ES: Jack, to the best of my knowledge, and maybe I'm wrong, you have never addressed the many historical sources collected by Sylvia Snowiss, Jack Rakove and others showing that the framers quite clearly had a conception of judicial review that was modest, humble, and centered around clear constitutional error (and the 14th did not change that according to the best historians of that time other than possibly for protecting the newly freed slaves). [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 6:00 am
The phrase “New Originalism” was first used Evan Nadel in 1996, but the phrase was popularized by Randy Barnett and Keith Whittington a few years later. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 6:15 am
But this view has been challenged, most prominently by Jack Balkin, who argues for "compatibilism"--the view that adherence to original public meaning is consistent with "living constitutionalism" in what we might call the "zone of construction" (relying on the Whittington-Barnett distinction between "interpretation" and "construction"). [read post]
