Search for: "Jackson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue" Results 21 - 40 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2014, 2:15 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:45 am by Samantha Fry
Dep’t of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Steven T. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 5:09 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm by Michael Froomkin
FIU international relations, political science. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:01 am by John Elwood
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 11-747, appears to be yet another hold for United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 13 December 2018 Master Giddens gave an ex tempore judgment in the slander claim of Kenny v Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:23 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm by John Elwood
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 11-582, is likely being held for United States v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
Commissioner of Internal Revenue 14-622Issue: Whether the President's authority under 26 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
Comm'r of Internal Revenue     Commissioner of Internal Revenue     NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION OPINIONS        Opinion Short Title/District 08a0723n.06  Vakilian v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Reuters has a piece “Explainer: Google, Facebook battle Australia over proposed revenue-sharing law”. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 10-1553, since the Long Conference. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Issue: Whether, under Seminole Tribe v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 21-379, which has been rescheduled twice. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am by ernst
  Soon after World War I, a committee of the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws started work on a model statute. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
The challenged provisions amended the Internal Revenue Code by adding: (1) a "penalty" payable to the Secretary of the Treasury by an individual taxpayer who failed to maintain adequate health insurance coverage and (2) an "assessable payment" payable to the Secretary of the Treasury by a "large employer" if at least on of its employees received a tax credit or government subsidy to offset payments for certain health-related expenses. [read post]