Search for: "Jackson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons" Results 21 - 35 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2012, 7:31 am by Robert Chesney
Defendant was targeted as a potential terrorist and became the subject of an ongoing investigation by the New York Joint Terrorism Task Force (“JTTF”) comprised of Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) agents and New York City Police Department (“NYPD”) detectives. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am by Steven M. Taber
Mills faces up to five years in prison and a $50,000 fine per day of violation when he is sentenced on September 22, 2010. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by smtaber
Mills faces up to five years in prison and a $50,000 fine per day of violation when he is sentenced on September 22, 2010. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am by Anna Christensen
Comstock (08-1224) Argued: Jan. 12, 2010 Issue: Whether Congress had the constitutional authority to enact 18 U.S.C. 4248, which authorizes court-ordered civil commitment by the federal government of (1) “sexually dangerous” persons who are already in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons, but who are coming to the end of their federal prison sentences, and (2) “sexually dangerous” persons who are in the custody of the Attorney… [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 10:01 pm
He will be subject to rigorous conditions of supervised release by federal authorities. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Jackson, No. 072510 Conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm is vacated and remanded where defendant was subjected to custodial interrogation before being given his Miranda warnings. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law pursuant to Mills… [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
P. 35(b) motion claiming that warden's alleged promise to create an opportunity for a sentence reduction as a reward for his assistance in prison effectively bound the government to file a Rule 35(b) motion on his behalf, judgment denying relief is affirmed where: 1) even if the warden did promise to file a Rule 35(b) motion, a warden within the Bureau of Prisons was unauthorized to make the motion as the "government" under Rule 35(b); and 2) a warden lacks… [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]