Search for: "Jacobs v. Smith" Results 21 - 40 of 238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2010, 9:01 am by Ray Dowd
Smith and Fritz Weinschenk, In Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants and ReversalGrosz v MoMA Amicus Brief - Nazi Art Looting  Purchase Copyright Litigation Handbook from West here   tweetmeme_source = 'raydowd'; Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 4th Ed. 2009) by Raymond J. [read post]
6 May 2016, 4:36 am by Brian Cordery
This judgment is a useful addition to the jurisprudence on the person skilled in the art which includes the Court of Appeal decision in Rockwater v Technip [2004] EWCA Civ 381 in which the recently retired Jacob LJ famously suggested that “the person skilled in the art …, if real, would be very boring – a nerd … But the skilled man is not a complete android“. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
The US Supreme Court rejected such an argument in Arkansas Educational Television Commission v Forbes (1998). [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
” At IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law’s SCOTUS now blog, Cody Jacobs remarks on the court’s recent denial of certiorari in Kolbe v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 7:30 am by Emma Lewis, Olswang LLP
They gave three reasons for their conclusion: No misuse of power Eclairs and Glengary sought to rely on the case of Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Petroleum Ltd [1974] AC 821 where it was held that the board had used their power for an improper purpose. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 4:01 am
Smith claimed that his guilty plea in the murder of Emmet Konzelman was no good since his supposed accomplice Jacob Edmonds -- who pleaded guilty to a lesser charge and testified against Smith -- later recanted his testimony.In his majority opinion, Reinhardt wrote that even though Smith had not exhausted his state claims, a rarely used exception should allow his case to move forward in federal court. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 4:01 am
Smith claimed that his guilty plea in the murder of Emmet Konzelman was no good since his supposed accomplice Jacob Edmonds -- who pleaded guilty to a lesser charge and testified against Smith -- later recanted his testimony.In his majority opinion, Reinhardt wrote that even though Smith had not exhausted his state claims, a rarely used exception should allow his case to move forward in federal court. [read post]
27 May 2016, 3:02 am
 Highlights include:Lambretta v Teddy Smith, where Etherton J in the High Court ruled that there was no design right or copyright in the colourways of a track topJacobson & Sons v Globe GB was a trade mark case relating to the flash on the side of Gola shoes - the registrations were held by Etherton J to be valid and infringedIn Cook Biotech Incorporated v Edwards Lifesciences AG, Etherton LJ in the Court of Appeal gave the leading judgment rejecting… [read post]
26 Jan 2019, 6:51 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Robin Smith, No. 115,586 (Johnson)Sentencing appeal (petition for review)Samuel D. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 7:42 am
 This is a difficult decision, with Jacob LJ and Mance LJ adopting different interpretations of the law and Sedley LJ apparently agreeing with Jacob LJ but not for the reason given by him. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 6:11 am by Mikhaila Fogel
VanLandingham dug into the Edward Gallagher case and former Secretary of the Navy Richard V. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by Melissa L. Greipp
Meredith Donaldson and Ben Lucareli AJ Lawton and Ashley Smith v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 3:42 am by SHG
It’s bad enough, both for substantive as well as factual reasons, that the Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]