Search for: "Jacobs v. Stone"
Results 21 - 40
of 82
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2011, 9:43 pm
Fannie/Freddie genre of government-sponsored enterprises called “monstrous moral hybrids” [Mark Calabria, Cato] Posner: lawyers appeared more likely to run junk-fax suit for own interests than clients’ [Beck, Trask (Creative Montessori Learning Centers v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:55 pm
We just published today David McGowan's article on rethinking New York Times v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:07 pm
Sir Robin Jacob (who retired from the Court of Appeal last year but was making one of his occasional reappearances) in giving the leading judgment noted Lord Nicholls in Mercedes Benz v Leiduck [1996] AC 284, p.308: “The court may grant an injunction against a party properly before it where this is required to avoid injustice […] The court habitually grants injunctions in respect of certain types of conduct. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
******************************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 30 [week ending Sunday 18 January] -- Julia Reda’s EU copyright revolution | GC on trade-marketing bottle shapes in (T-69/14 and T-70/14) | IPKat and BLACA’s event on Sensory copyright | IP Cross-Border Enforcement | US Supreme Court in Teva v Sandoz | On-line copyright infringement in Spain | GC on the ‘Pianissimo’ trade mark for vacuum cleaners… [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:22 am
Mr Justice Nugee heard the application and what follows is taken from the transcript.He was keen from the outset to inspect the physical samples of the products, confirming the approach to registered design cases advocated by Sir Robin Jacob in Dyson v Vax:“What really matters is what the court can see with its own eyes. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:57 am
* Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:48 am
In connection with that analysis, Vice Chancellor Parsons also discussed his May 2011 decision in In Re Smurfit Stone Container Corp. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:39 am
* Judicial independence: Europe's IP judges raise EPO concerns Jeremy breaks the news of Sir Robin Jacob writing to Jesper Kongstad, Chairman of the Administrative Council of the EPO, on behalf of the Intellectual Property Judges’ Association (IPJA). [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
****************************** PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 28 [week ending Sunday 11 January] -- German Minister for Agriculture against GIs | Europe’s 2015 resolutions re innovation | All the must-read IP blogs | UK and EU Parliaments v the EPO | The bizzarre EPO BoA’s Business Distribution Scheme | UPC location in London | New spare-part reference to the CJEU | Sir Robin Jacob and other Europe Judges for… [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:34 am
” Williamson v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:58 pm
Shane, Jacob E. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm
(Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg) The Supreme Court has just agreed to hear Packingham v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm
Ashutosh Bhagwat, Richard Garnett, Andrew Koppelman, Seth Kreimer, Lawrence Lessig, Sanford Levinson, Robert O’Neil, David Post, Lawrence Sager, Seana Shiffrin, Steven Shiffrin, Geoffrey Stone, Nadine Strossen, William Van Alstyne and James Weinstein. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:20 pm
In Stone v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:20 pm
In Stone v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:58 am
WXY – in the cases of WXY v Gewanter and Stone v WXY (Persons Unknown). [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am
At Reason, Jacob Sullum, Damon Root, and Sheldon Richman offer their thoughts. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:25 am
To the express delight of the assembled flock of IP lawyers (or is it a “conspiracy” of IP lawyers, as per Sir Robin Jacob’s keynote speech?) [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
On the same day, there were hearings on applications for injunctions in the cases of Payone v Logo and Searl v Dimova-Handley. [read post]
