Search for: "James B. Hobbs" Results 21 - 40 of 45
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2016, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Landis: A Life on Fire (Hart Publishing).New Books adds an interview with Marc Simon Rodriguez, who discusses his new book, Rethinking the Chicano Movement (Routledge).H-Net has a review of Tameka B. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 8:47 am by Thomas Valenti
Utility of Mediation in Sri Lanka by  Saranee Gunathilaka* Introduction Today, in Sri Lanka, mediation has become a coerced choice upon parties to a dispute. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am by John Elwood
Another popular activity with the Nine has been trying to figure out what the Hobbs Act can prohibit. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 12:26 pm by Steve Kalar
Throw in due process challenges to statutes like 18 USC § 3142(f)(1)(A) (Bail Reform Act), the Hobbes Act, Section 924(c)offenses, and ACCA, and much welcome mischief awaits. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 3:35 am by Randy Barnett
., a Harvard man like his former-colleague James Bradley Thayer who pushed the Progressives to adopt restraint as their tactic. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 4:43 pm
The text we read was, I believe, from his Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad Bhāṣya. Śaṅkara was trying to illuminate the meaning of the root text in light of his Advaitavāda. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am by Kedar Bhatia
§ 1951 (a)(the Hobbs Act) and 18 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm by Kedar Bhatia
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am by Kedar Bhatia
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 5:51 am
For this proposition, reliance was placed on a first instance decision, Mitchell & Hobbs v Mill [1966] 2 BCLC 102, where Mr Machin QC had held that an individual director, as a general rule, lacks the power to commence proceedings in the name of the company. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
  Cotroneo is a curious case out of the Fifth Circuit in which Judge James L. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
In response to certified questions, the New York Court of Appeals held that (a) proceeds of a fraud could constitute marital property, and (b) when part or all of the marital estate consisted of the proceeds of fraud, that fact did not, as a matter of law, preclude a determination that a spouse paid fair consideration according to the terms of New York's Debtor and Creditor Law section 272. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:37 pm by cdw
” [via Jon Sands] James Pavat, et. al. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
Missouri:  Families and the Law by Catherine Earnshaw-Hobbs, Esq. [read post]