Search for: "James v. City of Chicago et al" Results 21 - 40 of 41
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
  I took the liberty of saying “yes” as in, for example, James F. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
  Commentary During the Ratification PeriodThe Federalist PapersThe Federalist No. 29 (Alexander Hamilton)The Federalist No. 46 (James Madison)Tench CoxeOther FederalistsD. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
– Larry O’Dell, CBS2 Chicago, July 26, 2010 A federal appeals court on Monday reversed a judge’s ruling requiring prompt installation of upgraded emission controls at three coal-fired power plants in Tennessee and one in Alabama. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am by Roshonda Scipio
[et al.].Chicago : The University of Chicago Press, 2009. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 8:26 am by Lyle Denniston
The eagerly awaited oral argument in McDonald, et al., v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
Docket: 08-974 Title: Lewis et al. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
: (Part 1 - SPICY IP), (Part 2 - SPICY IP)   Global – Copyright International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI): ‘Three strikes’ effort hit worldwide home run: (Ars Technica), How to attribute a Creative Commons licensed work: (Molly Kleinman), Chrysalis disappoints, as new artists fail to incubate: (IP finance), DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt)     Events 26 August:… [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be… [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
  In finding its application of Kravis proper, the Board found that the Respondent could not have relied on the due process standard overruled by Kravis as well settled when it withdrew recognition of the union, because the Supreme Court's earlier decision in NLRB v. [read post]