Search for: "Jammie Thomas-Rasset"
Results 21 - 40
of 247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2010, 11:50 am
In the Jammie Thomas-Rasset case, Judge Michael Davis has appointed a special master to help facilitate settlement. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 10:27 am
Jury has found Jammie Thomas-Rasset willfully infringed 24 sound recordings. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 9:35 am
The court in the Jammie Thomas-Rasset case today reduced the jury's award of $80,000 per song to just $2,250, concluding that the "verdict [of] $2 million for stealing 24 songs for personal use is simply shocking. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:40 pm
The third trial of Jammie Thomas-Rasset may have just gotten a lot more interesting:Nesson motion for pro hac vice Trial is set to begin Tuesday, Nov. 2, and will concern only damages. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:51 am
The major record labels and Jammie Thomas-Rasset don't agree on much, but they have come together in perfect harmony to tell the court: Hell no, we won't settle. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 1:22 pm
Thomas-Rasset, defendant's motion to extend her time to file her brief to February 6th has been granted.Order extending defendant's time to file brief responding to RIAA's brief var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 7:42 am
Jammie Thomas-Rasset's lawyers have filed their opposition to the RIAA's motion to prevent defendant from objecting to the plaintiffs' copyright registrations, in Capitol Records v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:19 pm
UPDATE: A third jury finds damages of $1.5 million this time against Jammie Thomas-Rasset (who had turned down a offer to settle for $25,000). [11/1/2010 post:] U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:19 am
Thomas-Rasset. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:21 pm
Davis, Chief Judge for the District of Minnesota, opened the remarkable third trial of peer-to-peer file-swapper Jammie Thomas-Rasset today with a quip. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 1:16 pm
Thomas-Rasset, the defendant has filed her reply brief in support of her motion to set aside the jury's $1.92 million verdict. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:57 pm
Thomas-Rasset (then just Jammie Thomas) went to trial two years ago, and was ordered to pay $222,000 by a different jury for the same songs. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 1:11 am
The parties in the record labels' case against Jammie Thomas-Rasset each filed their reply briefs in support of their post-trial motions on Friday.Here's Thomas-Rasset's Reply in support of her Motion for a New Trial, Remittitur, and to Alter and Amend the Judgment. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:20 am
Thomas-Rasset's computer, not her. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
The judge in the Jammie Thomas-Rasset case today granted the parties' joint motion for relief from the court's previous order to participate in settlement talks. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 12:02 pm
The record label plaintiffs have offered to settle the Jammie Thomas-Rasset case for a $25,000 donation by the defendant to "an appropriate charity benefiting musicians" and vacatur of the court's Jan. 22 order remitting the jury's award of $80,000 per song down to $2,250. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:34 am
Minnesota's top federal judge, Michael Davis, certainly seems like a man who just wants the (in)famous Jammie Thomas-Rasset peer-to-peer file-sharing case on his docket to just go away. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 2:19 am
The $1.92 million jury award against Jammie-Thomas Rasset passes constitutional muster, the Department of Justice stated in a brief filed today.DOJ Brief in defense of Thomas-Rasset Award In June, a Minneapolis federal jury found that Thomas-Rasset had used KaZaA to download and "share" 24 songs without permission, and awarded the record label plaintiffs $80,000 per work. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:45 am
In a strange twist to an already surprising case, a recent change to bankruptcy law could shelter Jammie Thomas-Rasset from the $1.92 million in damages she has been ordered to pay the Recording Industry Association of America, according to a CNET article. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 6:14 pm
The record label plaintiffs have opted for a third trial against Jammie Thomas-Rasset rather than accept the court's decision to reduce the jury's award from $1.92 million to $54,000. [read post]
