Search for: "Jane Does 2-X" Results 21 - 40 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The fact that Jane is actually innocent of the robbery does not in any way negate the “reasonableness” of what the police do. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:01 am by Nicholas Nugent
Here we see classic content moderation in action, as defined by two variables: (1) the scope of concern and (2) the scope of action. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This line of cases does more than create a conflict with Rogers and its progeny. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 5:13 pm by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 105/16(6) To keep court documents public and respect the privacy of people who deserve it, the Illinois statute allows you to file under fictitious names (usually John Doe or Jane Doe) “Upon application and for good cause shown the parties may appear under fictitious names. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 12:21 pm by lawmrh
It’s not a B.F.D. to praise a jackass for moving if you had to first use a 2 X 4 across its ass. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Kari D. Boyle
” What does this have to do with the Youth Voices Initiative (of the BC Family Justice Innovation Lab)? [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:00 am by Jonathan Bailey
Where a topic like “Write an essay about Jane Eyre” is likely to provide students with dozens of easy sources to plagiarize, a topic such as “Compare Jane’s plight to that of X” is much more difficult and requires the student to have a much more complete grasp of the works involved. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am by Eugene Volokh
Servs., Inc., No. 17-CV-8220 (JPO), 2018 WL 2021588, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
On the other hand, a statement that in effect communicates, "We have evidence that Jane Smith did X or said Y," when it turns out that she didn't do X or say Y, is treated as a factual assertion, which can indeed be actionable defamation. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Because the district court entered a default judgment on liability, we treat it as conclusively established that Cenk Sidar raped Jane Doe in London in September 2017. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am by Eugene Volokh
Because the district court entered a default judgment on liability, we treat it as conclusively established that Cenk Sidar raped Jane Doe in London in September 2017. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am by Eugene Volokh
Because the district court entered a default judgment on liability, we treat it as conclusively established that Cenk Sidar raped Jane Doe in London in September 2017. [read post]