Search for: "Jane Doe IP"
Results 21 - 40
of 135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2007, 10:05 pm
John Doe Numbers 1 Through 10, 07civ02643, filed Oct. 1, 2007. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:25 pm
"Representation in the IPEC Small Claims Track" is the title of a most interesting article by Jane Lambert (of NIPClaw fame) on the London IP and Technology Law blog, here. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:12 am
IP and Economy In 'Does IP boost the European economy? [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:57 am
/Jane M. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 10:33 am
History may not necessarily determine the current IP moment, but it certainly has the power to instruct. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 1:31 pm
While the announcement does not require Judges to have technical backgrounds, the IP court judiciary should be selected from judiciary who have excellent performance in IP or related judicial works, or professionals who have equivalent qualifications and conditions in IP legal practice, legal research and teaching law. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 12:09 am
They may not be entitled to formal IP protection, but they still enjoy intangible value. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:01 am
Jane Ginsburg: emerging concepts of IP rights and limitations; each paper paired with commentary from a different jurisdiction, usually US/EU. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 2:17 pm
This panel, which was moderated by Prof Jane Ginsburg and composed of eminent European personalities, has just finished discussing recent case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:54 pm
Some have decided that the joinder of numerous defendants in a single lawsuit is improper, and dismissed all the Does except for a single John or Jane. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
John Doe and Jane Doe, 2014 FC 161, provides insight into the collision of Norwich Orders, means used to identify unknown infringers, and the growing business model of copyright trolls giving rise for the Courts to be more mindful of playing a role in potentially abusive behaviour of the trolls. [read post]
15 May 2015, 3:46 pm
The court was careful to explain that it appreciated the seriousness of the harms the plaintiffs alleged: ``To avoid any misunderstanding, let me make it clear that the court is not unsympathetic to the tragic plight described by Jane Doe No. 1, Jane Doe No. 2, and Jane Doe No. 3. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:39 am
IPWeek @ SG 2018 | Around the IP Blogs! [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:01 am
Question: Does John have a cause of action for copyright infringement against Jane? [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:06 am
How does it work? [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 11:51 pm
Course organiser Jane Cornwell will be happy to field questions and provide further information.Off to Moldova? [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am
My former law partner and long-time spouse Jane Coleman does. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 10:53 am
A fun read for IP and/or love story enthusiasts! [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:52 am
It does come down to protection v. exercise. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 10:18 am
As noted by University of Ottawa law professor Michael Geist, the producers behind Hurt Locker, Voltage Pictures, filed suit against a number of John and Jane Does in Quebec towards the end of August. [read post]
