Search for: "Jefferson v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,802
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2024, 6:07 am
This is what happened in the 1995, Fort Worth Court of Appeals opinion styled, Hunt v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 3:28 am
We're doing DEI wrong — via Business Insider Can states legally ban "woke" training in the workplace? [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm
It also suggests a modest resolution to SEC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
Indeed, Jefferson Davis raised the Fourteenth Amendment in just such a defensive context. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
It also suggests a modest resolution to SEC v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
The text applies to those who hold "civil office under the Authority of the United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Sandford, Plessy v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 3:44 am
” And yet, in his five-page dissent from the denial of cert in Coalition for TJ v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 12:53 pm
The Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 11:27 am
Trevino v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
During last week’s Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
” The timeframe for decision in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
The relevant precedent would be Arizona v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm
(Wikimedia)Today's Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
Stay tuned.The post Attending Oral Argument in <i>Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
Jefferson Davis: President of the United States? [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from… [read post]