Search for: "Jennifer Daskal"
Results 21 - 40
of 140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2019, 2:58 am
Singapore law restricting so-called fake news “could force companies to tell the government what websites users have viewed” [Jennifer Daskal, New York Times] Ruling People’s Action Party “is notorious for its practice of bringing lawsuits against opposition members,” sometimes “for defamation upon criticizing the PAP,” while blog authors are “often pressured to register as members of political bodies if their posts touch upon… [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 12:44 pm
Autorité des marchés financiers Filipe Antunes Madeira da Silva, Fabio Costa Morosini & Michelle Sanchez Badin, Mestizo International Law: Petrobras saga Paul Schiff Berman & Jennifer Daskal, Legal challenges of data dominance: Yahoo! [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:46 am
Arab Bank Jennifer Daskal, Google Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 7:22 am
Congress this fall will likely face the first executive agreement negotiated under the new Cloud Act. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:53 am
Kris recommended the recent CSIS report by Jennifer Daskal and Will Carter: “Low-Hanging Fruit: Evidence-Based Solutions to the Digital Evidence Challenge. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 1:04 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare David Kris supported the recommendations in Jennifer Daskal and Will Carter’s new CSIS report: “Low-Hanging Fruit: Evidence-Based Solutions to the Digital Evidence Challenge. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 11:42 am
William Carter and Jennifer Daskal announced the launch event for their new CSIS report titled “Low-Hanging Fruit: Evidence-Based Solutions to the Digital Evidence Challenge. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 5:00 am
Professor Jennifer Daskal and Will Carter of the Center for Strategic and International Studies have written a terrific report, “Low-Hanging Fruit: Evidence-Based Solutions to the Digital Evidence Challenge. [read post]
16 Jun 2018, 7:30 am
Jennifer Daskal and Paul Rosenzweig underscored the many problems with the ruling, and urged us not to forget it in a crowded news cycle. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
Jennifer Daskal and Paul Rosenzweig criticized the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision that forced labor constitutes material support. [read post]
26 May 2018, 7:19 am
Jennifer Daskal and Peter Swire considered one possible framework for a U.S. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:30 am
” Jennifer Daskal suggests that transfers may be permissible under two separate GDPR derogations, described in more detail by Cooper-Ponte. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:00 am
As Jennifer Daskal and Peter Swire described earlier this week, Attorney General Jeff Sessions met with senior European law-enforcement officials on May 22 to discuss a path forward. [read post]
22 May 2018, 6:21 am
Jennifer Daskal and Peter Swire described the key legal requirements under U.S. and EU law for law enforcement access to data, and explored a framework EU-U.S. agreement that appears to satisfy the legal requirements of both the Cloud Act and EU law. [read post]
5 May 2018, 7:43 am
” Jennifer Daskal and Peter Swire outlined recommendations for the negotiation of executive agreements under Section 5 of the Cloud Act, legislation facilitating law enforcement’s access to data stored abroad. [read post]
1 May 2018, 11:02 am
Jennifer Daskal and Peter Swire set forth recommendations for formulation and negotiation of executive agreements under Section 5 of the Cloud Act. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:45 pm
Jennifer Daskal and Peter Swire argued in an initial essay posted on Lawfare that the CLOUD Act will enhance, rather than dilute, privacy and human rights protections on balance. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:45 pm
Jennifer Daskal and Peter Swire argued in an initial essay posted on Lawfare that the CLOUD Act will enhance, rather than dilute, privacy and human rights protections on balance. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 4:43 am
Jennifer Daskal and Peter Swire rebutted Neema Singh Guliani and Naureen Shah’s response to their contention that the CLOUD Act will improve privacy and civil liberties protections. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jennifer Daskal and Peter Swire responded to Neema Singh Guliani and Naureen Shah’s rebuttal of their assertion that the CLOUD Act will enhance privacy and civil liberties protections. [read post]
