Search for: "John/Jane Doe I"
Results 21 - 40
of 631
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2023, 12:58 pm
And so I think we just had a lot of experience in dicksterity Kind of what does it mean to try these things and to experimented and to do that? [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
And here is the second decision that was upheld, Magistrate Judge John Anderson's decision in Doe v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Thus, the complaint is dismissed as to John/Jane Does I-XX as well as NYSIF. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Thus, the complaint is dismissed as to John/Jane Does I-XX as well as NYSIF. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
I thought I'd pass along a long excerpt from this amicus brief, which my students Samantha Frazier, Katelyn Taira, and Jacob Haas and I wrote on behalf of the First Amendment Coalition and myself; for more on the decision below, which indeed rejected pseudonymity, see here. [* * *] Summary of Argument John Doe is trying to punish Jane Doe … for accusing him of sexual assault. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 5:56 am
Danforth, John Lucian Smith, Jr. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 2:46 pm
Greg Lambert 0:38 Yeah, so in she does great work and reaching out to a lot of women that are on there that are members of the bar, members of the bench, and just members of the legal community. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 8:37 am
Defendant John Doe 2 stated, "I'm not taking away your First Amendment rights," and that the museum is a "neutral zone. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 7:33 pm
Rev. 343 (2011); John A. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
" Outside of John Doe, Jane Doe, and Sue Roe, the complaint identifies almost every other individual with initials…. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 5:51 pm
In yet another case, Jane Doe had a past conviction from a criminal case that occurred more than 30 years and had been vacated. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 4:49 pm
The Six things Bill Marler does not eat. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 4:02 pm
Consider John Doe's argument in favor of pseudonymity: [I.] [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Indeed, even if a law school does want to say that one side is correct—again, something I'd recommend against, for reasons given in the University of Chicago's Kalven Report[1]—it can do so, while still stressing that it's important for people to hear both sides: Come hear John Peters and Jane Williams debate immigration policy! [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 7:28 am
" Had Plaintiff filed a complaint in which she identified herself as Jane Doe and Named Defendant as "John Doe"—i.e., providing anonymity both for herself and the accused—the Court would have granted the request for relief with little hesitation. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 4:37 pm
Thomas smiles, but there does not seem to be any small talk between them. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 4:13 am
“We expect that Russia will do what Russia always does — they will veto it,” U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:34 am
Paul Sonne and John Hudson report for the Washington Post. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 5:17 am
MIT, by Judge Bruce Selya, joined by Judges Rogeriee Thompson and Gustavo Gelpi (note that I submitted an amicus brief in the case, in support of neither side): [I.] [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:22 am
John Doe formed a relationship with a classmate whom we shall call “Jane Roe. [read post]
