Search for: "John/Jane Does, in their official capacities"
Results 21 - 26
of 26
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2012, 11:14 am
…”(emphasis added) In other words, it could be defamatory to say “John took the money belonging to Jane”, as much as if you had said “John committed theft under s. 322 of the Criminal Code. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 12:23 am
Defendants John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and XYZ Company who are sued herein under fictitious names because their true names and capacities are unknown at this time. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 8:29 am
An alternative method for the aggregation of values, namely, the product rule proposed by John Nash, is also available. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:18 pm
Another member of that clan, a student identified only as Jane Doe, claimed she was repeatedly tortured, sexually mutilated, raped and beaten. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 8:17 pm
Plaintiffs allege three counts, two of which are only against "Sgt. 'McQ,' Domelights.com a/k/a Domelights Enterprises, LLC and JOHN/JANE DOES ## 1-10,000," the other of which is: FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATION/DISCRIMINATION HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT ON THE BASIS OF RACE 42 U.S.C. [read post]
2 May 2009, 10:12 am
May 1, 2009)(Jefferson) (governmental immunity, retrospective vs. prospective relief, equitable relief against official capacity defendant not barred by sovereign immunity doctrine)THE CITY OF EL PASO, ET AL. v. [read post]
