Search for: "John Doe A,B,C and D" Results 21 - 40 of 1,359
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm by vforberger
Opportunity (Ewers, McGillis, and Hutton) (3 Dec. 2015), aff’d McGillis v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm by admin
… It certainly does not ensure that the work has been fully vetted in terms of the data analysis and the proper application of research methods. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 4:21 am
In re C&D Brewing Ventures, Inc., Serial No. 88935220 (March 26, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Wendy B. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am by David Pocklington
The cutting down of a mature tree and replacing it with a stone or concrete plinth without either List B permission or a faculty; and d. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
Moreover, the term “shall” at the beginning of the first sentence reflects that the obligation is binding on Canada and does not give space for discretionary application of the rule. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Readers are requested to notify the Reporter ofDecisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Second, the presumption is triggered when the merged firm’s market share is (c) greater than 30% and (d) the change in HHI is greater than 100. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by News Desk
As part of its enforcement activities, the Food and Drug Administration sends warning letters to entities under its jurisdiction. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:45 am by Mark Graber
  I have discovered only one relative minor legal treatise published before 1866 that dissents from this consensus.Constitutional lawyers when Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment was framed recognized that an insurrection involved a) an assemblage, b) resisting any federal law or interfering with the course of a federal proceeding, c) by force or intimidation, d) for a public purpose. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
LexisNexis has selected some of the top “noteworthy” panel decisions issued by the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board during the period July through December 2023. [read post]