Search for: "John Doe III"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,303
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
. [* * *] I've been hearing some buzz about whether House Speaker John A. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
III. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:05 pm
The justification, in other words, does not negate liability. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Right now, Nebraska (along with Maine) does not allocate presidential electors in a winner-take-all fashion. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 11:45 am
That the group came to a consensus on core principles does not mean that each member would applythose principles in the same way in shaping the details of reform legislation. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 10:58 am
Second loading does about 6-10 days later of ~100 mg of the same, again in the deltoid. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
That does not suggest laissez faire in the style of Milton Friedman--it does suggest that public policy creates guard rails and expectations but does not drive micro-decision making. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 4:21 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am
It is unfortunate that, whilst it does not suggest any alteration in the works proposed, it does raise urgent concern about the stability of the painted ceiling which will require a detailed condition survey which, the conservators advise should be before the works, the subject of this faculty, commence. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
Yet, it does not justify an interpretation of the Constitution that tolerates let alone sustains corporate infringement of individual rights and encroachment on governmental powers. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm
Circuit largely disagreed with the district court about the statute, finding that the agency’s reading satisfied Chevron.[8] On one point, though, the court of appeals found that the Federal Reserve had inadequately explained its decision to limit its regulation.[9] Like Judge Leon, the appellate judges realized that eliminating the legal effect of the rule while the agency conducted further proceedings would harm the plaintiffs, who had prevailed on that point.[10] The… [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:24 am
Some of the justices (including Chief Justice John Roberts) would worry in that case about transgressing the bounds of Article III, though others (Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch) seemed to think there were easy ways to avoid that problem. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
So how does Attia’s book fall short? [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
Contra Shugerman, it does not matter if Congress authorized ad [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Nor is this constitutional and anti-SLAPP law protection lost because some small portion of the audience for a book, film, TV program, song, or even a video game does something harmful in a way that was misguidedly inspired by the speech. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
It does honor to the distinguished and long running series of which it is now an integral part. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
See Part III at 399. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
[Blackman & Tillman,] Part III, supra, at 424–28. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:14 am
This bill does no more. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
If there is nothing that any agent (individual, institutional, or collective) does in any historically and nomologically accessible world that brings a future state of the world about, then the future state is outside the feasible choice set. [read post]
