Search for: "John Doe Larkin"
Results 21 - 40
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2021, 6:08 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 3:51 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 3:19 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 6:15 am
Larkin). [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 3:47 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 2:35 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 4:04 am
"Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlogger comment: I guess life's not so good for LG at the TTAB.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 6:58 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
17 May 2017, 3:03 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:13 am
District Judge John Bates said in a written opinion Tuesday that al-Awlaki’s father does not have the authority to sue on his son’s behalf. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Robinson) in which the courts have adopted a different approach towards constitutional statutes. 14:12 John Larkin QC observes the recent trend towards purposive, as against “generous”, construction of statutes (including constitutional statutes). 14:10 John Larkin QC discusses the scope and purpose of s.1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998, which governs the status of Northern Ireland as part of the United Kingdom. 14:00 John… [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 3:06 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 5:50 am
" John Wilson "trusted a con man who stole his money. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 3:05 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:58 am
I wrote a paper about these hurdles (here) in 2004.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 3:09 am
The record "shows that farm equipment commonly bears colors and designs, but does not show that those combinations of colors and designs . . . would automatically be recognized as source-identifiers, not ornamentation. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 3:56 am
The opinion is a primer on the basics of mere descriptiveness.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 3:36 am
David John Critchley, Cancellation No. 92059924 and Opposition No. 91218282 [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher Larkin).The Marks: Not surprisingly, the Board found the marks to be identical in appearance, sound, and meaning. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:22 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
19 May 2022, 3:21 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
