Search for: "John Does, I-IX"
Results 21 - 40
of 209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
I thought I'd pass along a long excerpt from this amicus brief, which my students Samantha Frazier, Katelyn Taira, and Jacob Haas and I wrote on behalf of the First Amendment Coalition and myself; for more on the decision below, which indeed rejected pseudonymity, see here. [* * *] Summary of Argument John Doe is trying to punish Jane Doe … for accusing him of sexual assault. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:41 am
I don’t even wait. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 4:43 am
I decided that Doe’s participation on the team would negatively impact the team atmosphere and severely hinder or eliminate the team’s ability to perform to their fullest potential. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 7:02 am
If I were persuaded that Doe's absence from the team directly resulted from Haverford's failure to follow its Title IX procedures, a finding of irreparable procedural harm would readily follow. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
First, I hope my legal analysis in these blog posts does not leave readers with the impression that I favor only open sports or that I am opposed to female-only sports teams. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
As I mentioned at the outset, one of my motivations for writing Gender Identity, Sports, and Affirmative Action: What's Title IX Got To Do With It? [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
" Outside of John Doe, Jane Doe, and Sue Roe, the complaint identifies almost every other individual with initials…. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 8:25 am
The relevant language of Title IX does not materially differ from the language of Title VII. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Johns County, Florida, (11th Cir., Dec. 30, 2022), the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals sitting en banc in a 7-4 decision held that separating use of male and female bathrooms in public schools based on students' biological sex does not violate either the Equal Protection Clause or Title IX. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 6:36 pm
Johns County's unremarkable bathroom policy neither violates the Equal Protection Clause nor Title IX. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 4:02 pm
Consider John Doe's argument in favor of pseudonymity: [I.] [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:25 am
I. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 12:30 pm
Sixth Circuit: It likely does. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 7:28 am
" Had Plaintiff filed a complaint in which she identified herself as Jane Doe and Named Defendant as "John Doe"—i.e., providing anonymity both for herself and the accused—the Court would have granted the request for relief with little hesitation. [read post]
17 Sep 2022, 3:53 am
Is there any reason they shouldn’t suffer what they tried to do, and did, to John Doe by ruining his life? [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
Sixth Circuit: Certainly does, and the emergency request for a stay is denied. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 9:21 am
Doe sued the university under Title IX and the two students—who had then been co-Presidents (consuls?) [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 10:52 am
It contains 14 counts, names 31 defendants, 10 "John Does" described as fictitious and unknown persons, and 10 "ABC Corporations" identified as fictitious and unknown entities. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 12:30 pm
A John Doe plaintiff alleges that he was put through a biased Title IX tribunal while a student at MIT. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 5:17 am
MIT, by Judge Bruce Selya, joined by Judges Rogeriee Thompson and Gustavo Gelpi (note that I submitted an amicus brief in the case, in support of neither side): [I.] [read post]
