Search for: "John Stinneford" Results 21 - 40 of 53
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2019, 6:54 am by Howard Bashman
“What Bucklew Doesn’t Say”: John Stinneford, a law professor who is a leading scholar on the original understanding of the Eighth Amendment, has this guest post at “The Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 2:00 am by mes286
University of Florida Levin College of Law – Scholarly Impact: Stephen Sachs Celebrates John Stinneford’s Academic Impact and Contribution. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 7:24 am by Terry Lenamon / Reba Kennedy
Berry III, assistant professor of law at the University of Mississippi where Professor Berry responds to an earlier article written by John F. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 7:35 am
Well timed in light of the Supreme Court's cert grant last week on lethal injection, John Stinneford has posted on SSRN this interesting looking article, entitled "The Original Meaning of 'Unusual': The Eighth Amendment as a Bar to Cruel Innovation. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 3:08 am by Howard Wasserman
., when I actually have to get cracking on my summer research projects), we welcome our new visitors for the month: Hadar Aviram (UC Hastings), David Fontana (George Washington) Ajay Mehrotra (American bar Foundation), Andra Robertson (Case Western), and John Stinneford (Florida). [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:44 am by John Stinneford
The Supreme Court’s proportionality jurisprudence under the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause appears to be undergoing a kind of renaissance. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 1:36 pm by The Federalist Society
To discuss the case, we have Professor John Stinneford, who is Associate Professor of Law and Assistant Director of the Criminal Justice Center at the University of Florida Levin College of Law. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 8:40 pm by Michael J.Z. Mannheimer
In case you missed it, John Stinneford and I have been having a lively debate in the comments section of my most recent post on my (admittedly novel) claim that the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause can be read in a state-specific way. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:18 am by The Federalist Society
To discuss the case, we have John Stinneford, who is an Associate Professor of Law and Assistant Director, Criminal Justice Center at the University of Florida Levin College of Law. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:29 am by The Federalist Society
 The question is whether the requirement that the robber force another person “to accompany him” requires proof of more than a minimal movement of the victim.Justice Scalia delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court, which held that a bank robber, for purposes of §2113(e), “forces [a] person to accompany him,” when he compels that person to go somewhere with him, even if the movement occurs entirely within a single building or over a short distance.To discuss the… [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Stinneford, University of Florida Levin College of Law, presented in Florida Law’s faculty workshop on “The Original Meaning of ‘Cruel. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:46 am by Aaron Tang
This week’s article is Rethinking Proportionality under the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause, written by University of Florida law professor John Stinneford and published in the University of Virginia Law Review. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 10:07 am by Michael O'Hear
Now, however, John Stinneford takes on Scalia’s interpretation of the original meaning of “cruel and unusual punishment” in a new paper entitled ”Rethinking Proportionality Under the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause. [read post]