Search for: "John Yoo" Results 21 - 40 of 1,456
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2010, 6:35 pm
  Watch the interview here.What was most surprising about the interview was how Jon Stewart really failed to lay any significant blow on John Yoo. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:58 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Reading the blogs today, you might think Marty Lederman and David Barron had gotten deeply in touch with their inner John Yoo when they wrote the Al-Aulaqi memo. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:38 pm by Sandy Levinson
John Yoo is famous (or notorious) for suggesting that the American president should be conceived as similar to a Hanoverian monarch. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 6:24 am
It even forbids courts from relying on foreign or international legal decisions in any decisions involving military commissions.Good to see that John Yoo and Jack Balkin are, for once, on the same page! [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 12:30 am
The case, filed by two Yale law clinic students along with two attorneys, sought damages from John Yoo for his role as [...] [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:15 pm by Tiffany Chiao
The Wall Street Journal, December 11, 2010 by John Yoo and Robert J. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:35 am by rmorgan
The Wall Street Journal, January 6, 2012 by John Yoo http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204720204577128610335846568.html? [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 3:01 am
Joseph Lavitt (University of California, Berkeley-School of Law Adjunct Faculty) has posted The Crime of Conviction of John Choon Yoo: The Actual Criminality in the OLC During the Bush Administration (Maine Law Review, Vol. 62, No. 1, 2009) on SSRN.... [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:39 pm by Suzanne Ito, ACLU
John Yoo, one of the former Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel attorneys who authored the infamous torture memos, will be Jon Stewart's guest on The Daily Show that night. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 4:48 pm
My colleague Brian Leiter offered an excellent discussion on April 18 of the John Yoo controversy. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:52 pm by Lawrence Solum
John Yoo (University of California at Berkeley School of Law) has posted Unitary, Executive, or Both? [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:03 am by Tiffany Chiao
Bolton and John Yoo http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/10/opinion/10bolton.html? [read post]
27 May 2010, 9:53 am by Lawrence Cunningham
The New York Times yesterday gave most of its op-ed page to John Yoo, the Berkeley law professor who attracted odium from adversaries for writing the Bush-era legal memos seeming to condone torture as a presidential prerogative. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 9:14 am by Orin Kerr
I have one more question to add on to yesterday’s post on John Yoo and the torture memos. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 8:24 am
Alas, the constitutional support for Yoo's position is gaining strength. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 3:42 am by Jack Goldsmith
John Yoo has a piece in the WSJ which argues that the real problem with the White Paper is that it extends due process protections to enemy combatants on the battlefield, thereby threatening to diminish due process at home: The real story revealed by the memo is that the Obama administration is trying to dilute the normal practice of war with law-enforcement methods. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 12:39 pm
In response to an on-line petition demanding that UC-Berkeley fire John Yoo from his position as a tenured professor of law, Brian Leiter posted a spirited defense of the value of tenure. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 4:53 am by JB
Here is John Yoo on the Jon Stewart show, explaining what the White House asked him to do in writing the Torture Memos:Yoo: Well, first thing, let me say, there were no legal precedents or practices ever before this. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 3:52 pm by Brian Wolfman
John Yoo was one of the key expositors of the unitary executive theory for the Bush Administration and a defender of "enhanced interrogation" in the War on Terror. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 12:26 am
Here's Magliocca, Old Hickory and John Yoo I want to thank Jack [Balkin at Balkinization] for inviting me to post a response to John [read post]