Search for: "Johnson v. Arnold"
Results 21 - 40
of 131
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am
” Fehr v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
On 10 March 2020 Nicol J heard an application in the case of Johnson v McArdle. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm
Prime Minister Boris Johnson confirmed the UK will seek to diverge from EU data protection rules and establish their own ‘sovereign’ controls in the field. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th Dept 2006]). [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 11:14 am
Sentencing Guidelines to Justify Limiting the Impact of Johnson v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm
Mr Justice Arnold and Mr Justice Dingemans, Mr Justice Popplewell, all of whom have presided over media cases, have been appointed to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 10:30 am
Murphy’s article Abandon Chevron and Modernize Stare Decisis for the Administrative State is cited in the following article: Kit Johnson, Pereira v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Hilliard v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 5:33 am
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Merger of felony murder and predicate felonies After a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Arnold Johnson, Jr. was convicted of first-degree felony murder, attempted robbery with a deadly weapon, first-degree burglary, and use of a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence. ... [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
Also see ---> Private student loan collection suit not removable to federal court (addressing state vs. federal jurisdiction issue in context of original collection suit; sanctions imposed for improper removal in Richards v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 7:40 pm
” If a juror’s statements during voir dire raise a doubt about his impartiality, such as statements that he has a pre-formed opinion about the case, that juror cannot be permitted to sit unless he states unequivocally that he can be fair and decide the case solely on the evidence adduced at trial (People v Johnson, 17 NY3d 752, 753 [2011]; People v Chambers, 97 NY2d 417, 419 [2002]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 362-363 [2001]; People… [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm
On 19 April 2018 Arnold J handed down a judgment on costs in the case of Ali v Channel 5 [2018] EWHC 840 (Ch). [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:46 am
The evening concluded with comments from Arnold J and Dr. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 9:42 am
”) Arnold v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:31 am
"Indeed, the AmeriKat thinks it will be a challenging for a lower court to apply such a doctrine in light of the Supreme Court's dicta in Actavis (as set out above).Sufficiency, novelty/obviousness and amendment Applying the principles summarized by Arnold J in Sandvik v Kennametal [2012] RPC 23, Mr Justice Carr also rejected RN Ventures classic insufficiency attack. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 8:14 pm
Johnson, United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:29 am
A legal malpractice claim accrues when the alleged injury to the client occurs, such as when the trust agreement was funded, regardless of the client’s awareness of the malpractice (Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 AD3d 59, 67 [Pt Dept 2015]; Pace v Raisman & Assoc. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:15 pm
The topic was the Texas v. [read post]
