Search for: "Johnson v. Department of Motor Vehicles" Results 21 - 40 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2021, 6:04 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
The Defendants were operators of separate motor vehicles, who blamed each other for causing the crash that killed the decedent. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 5:00 am
Erie Insurance Exchange, 308 A.3d 780, and, in the process, showed moderation with respect to its previous trend of favoring plaintiffs’ causes.In Rush, much to the surprise of some,the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that, as presented in this case, the regular use exclusion contained in motor vehicle insurance policies did not violate the express language of Pennsylvania's Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL).The plaintiff in Rush was a… [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 5:00 am
Hills and Ridges DoctrineOver the past year, one court addressed the issue of whether the Hills and Ridges Doctrine should be applied where a Plaintiff fell in an area that was covered by an awning or a canopy.In the case of Johnson v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 10:30 am
”  On the other hand, as the Indiana Court of Appeals concluded in Johnson v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm by Henry Miller
Department of Transportation evaluated the impacts of a Utah law that reduced the blood alcohol concentration limit for operating a motor vehicle from .08 grams per deciliter to .05 grams per deciliter. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:47 am by Erin Miller
Petitioner’s reply Title: Johnson Controls v. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 7:31 am
OpinionPub DateShort Title/District 07a0486p.06 2007/12/17 USA v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:51 pm
Dept. of Child Services (NFP) Adoption of A.J.; Brenda Johnson v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 11:45 pm by Aaron
Acevedo’s conviction for possession of a stolen motor vehicle, holding that a vehicle does not have to be operable or, indeed complete – this “vehicle” was purchased without a motor or transmission – to satisfy the elements of this crime. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
Lueck (Tex 2009)MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENTS: DOES THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS RUN WHILE DRIVER WHO CAUSED ACCIDENT IN TEXAS IS OUT OF STATE? [read post]