Search for: "Johnson v. Department of the Air Force" Results 21 - 40 of 86
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
Lucy, an African American graduate student, enrolled at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, pursuant to a court order in the case of Lucy v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Sean Quirk
Air Force B-52s in the South China Sea. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 11:29 pm
Benn was co-counsel for Johnson v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
  June 1, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Domestic Relations Law  253 does not provide that a defendant must provide plaintiff with a GetIn Cohen v Cohen, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2019 WL 2112972, 2019 N.Y. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm by Peter L. Strauss
Do we really need to be concerned that newspapers and the public misunderstand United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
On 10 March 2020  Nicol J heard an application in the case of Johnson v McArdle. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
– Gene Johnson, The Seattle Times, January 26, 2010 Washington state will do more to prevent polluted stormwater from running off state highways into rivers, lakes and Puget Sound. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 11:01 am by Benjamin Bissell
Stars and Stripes reports that Air Force pilot Captain William Dubois was killed when his F-16 Falcon crashed due to maintenance problems on Sunday afternoon. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 1:06 am
” In 2003, Todd Construction received two task orders from the United States Army Corps of engineers (“Corps”) for roof repair of buildings at the Seymour Johnson Air Force Base in North Carolina, and the work was completed in September of 2005. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 10:54 am by Andrew Hamm
In Air Force One on the way to the funeral of Ambassador to the United Nations Adlai Stevenson, President Lyndon Johnson convinced Goldberg to succeed the late ambassador. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
§ 7410’s express limit on the EPA’s disapproval authority and decisions of other courts of appeals, the EPA may substitute its own policy preferences for a state’s about the appropriate means of controlling air pollution within that state, without identifying any applicable “requirement of th[e] [Clean Air Act]” with which the state’s chosen means would interfere; and (2) whether the panel erred under SEC v. [read post]