Search for: "Johnson v. Supreme Court of the United States et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 192
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
” Other briefs that make this argument: Seattle School District No. 1; Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), Congressman Mike Johnson (R-LA), et al. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
The state and its instrumentalities tend to be risk averse--the essence of the ideology of compliance based governmentality. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm
United States The Supreme Court is also expected to hear two cases – Moody v NetChoice and NetChoice v Paxton – concerning the constitutionality of laws in Florida and Texas, which restrict the content moderation capabilities of social media companies. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Part IV examines the three major state supreme court cases involving Bowie knives: In Georgia, Nunn v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am
Croxall was taken off the air on 24 October 2022, after she was alleged to have shown bias when Boris Johnson pulled out of the Tory leadership contest. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm
As mentioned above, on 11 October there was a statement in open court in the case of Smith v Backhouse. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 12:18 pm
BPX Operating Co., et al. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 5:03 pm
James Breheny, et al. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Tan Phu Cuong Investment, LLC et al. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 6:13 am
In Miracle-Pond, et al. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
In another, Logan Alters, et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
United States The Gu [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am
Kiser et al, 2019 WL 4017033, at *7 (S.D. [read post]
Thoughts on the SG’s “Lesbian Comparator” Argument in the Pending Title VII Sexual-Orientation Cases
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
Zarda, No. 17-1623—the Supreme Court will consider whether the provision in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 making it unlawful for a covered employer to “discriminate against” an employee “because of such individual’s . . . sex” prohibits that employer from firing an employee because he’s a gay man. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm
He cited subsequent cases that have construed Kiyemba narrowly: Aamer, et al. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:25 am
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that a unit operator may not recover post-production costs from an unleased mineral owner’s share of production proceeds in Allen Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:25 am
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that a unit operator may not recover post-production costs from an unleased mineral owner’s share of production proceeds in Allen Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:25 am
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that a unit operator may not recover post-production costs from an unleased mineral owner’s share of production proceeds in Allen Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
