Search for: "Johnson v. Think Computer Corporation" Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2012, 2:43 am by Florian Mueller
Actually, it pales by comparison.By coincidence, Marvell's lead counsel, Quinn Emanuel's Kevin Johnson, was also on Samsung's team in the Apple trial. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Implications for Commercial Anti-Bribery Laws"; Philip Nichols, University of Pennsylvania, "An International Norm for Corporate Criminal Liability for Bribery"; and Karen Halverson Cross (right), John Marshall-Chicago, "Arbitration of Mass Sovereign Debt Claims: Abaclat v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
  What I can do is warn you about a few traps that seem to cloud a lot of thinking and discussion around this stuff. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:57 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/MiHqzt (John Mello) As Expert Witnesses, Industry Experts Play Key Roles In Litigation Cases - http://bit.ly/Q1KW1u (Rick Arnett) Big Win for Bloggers: TechnoBuffalo Court Victory Shields Source of Leaked Photos - http://bit.ly/LroLLy (Eric Johnson) Firewalls Between Exchange Servers? [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:23 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
They're not per se unreasonable, as the district court's opinion in Kadant Johnson, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:06 am by Kevin
But Johnson notes that we protect certain rights of others who can't sue, by (for example) appointing guardians for infants, and that we have granted legal rights to things that technically don't exist, like corporations. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:35 pm by WIMS
The discussion draft overturns the landmark Supreme Court case Massachusetts v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Frank Pasquale
(Review of Ian Bremmer, The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Hulteen, No. 07-543Title VII/Denial of pre-'79 pregnancy leave service credits in computing pensiono Set for argument December 10, 2008o SCOTUSWIKI hereSelected Pending Petitions for Certiorari:Ricci v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]