Search for: "Johnston v. Still" Results 21 - 40 of 142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2011, 3:15 am
It said the Commission apparently “assumed that the waiver contained in the 1989 agreement was still operative” -- it never actually made a finding to that Johnston was still a probationary employee. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 12:08 pm
It is still unclear, 10 months after the fact, why despite that profile police decided to arrest Mr. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
But I suspect the  two, separating partners in Beauchamp v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 12:13 pm by Tobias Thienel
Nor can it create rights that have no foothold in the Convention (Johnston and Others v Ireland, para 53). [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Contrary to the defendants’ contention, the plaintiff was entitled to commence this legal malpractice action even though the underlying personal injury action was still pending, as the legal malpractice action accrued, at the latest, in November 2014 (see Johnston v Raskin, 193 AD2d 786, 787). [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:52 am
Johnston's testimony that when he arrived at School on Saturday June 10th, the alarm system was still on and therefore Landin could not have been there at that time also stands unchallenged. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 10:10 pm
But it is sadder still when the dispute is about which child will look after their ailing parent. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:33 pm
  This question is likely still haunting Cisco following last week's US Supreme Court defeat in Commil USA, LLC v Cisco Systems, Inc (2015), Annsley says.* The European Inventor Award - what is the EPO doing? [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Contrary to the defendants’ contention, the plaintiff was entitled to commence this legal malpractice action even though the underlying personal injury action was still pending, as the legal malpractice action accrued, at the latest, in November 2014 (see Johnston v Raskin, 193 AD2d 786, 787 [1993]). [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 5:25 am by Gregory Forman
 That was the holding in the January 19, 2011 Court of Appeals decision in Reiss v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:58 am by Peter Mahler
In late August, by which time Flor still hadn’t been paid any salary, feeling she had no “other choice,” Flor sent Johnston a markup of the LOI. [read post]