Search for: "Johnston v. Superior Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
Moffitt-Johnston. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 12:52 pm
See Johnston v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 7:04 pm
The 55-page ruling in State of Washington v. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 7:23 am
Johnston, COA24-816, ___ N.C. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1350-51 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:51 am
Mar. 10, 2004) (“[T]he Sorensen Plaintiffs’ remedy is found in the FLSA and not the common law of quantum meruit”); Johnston v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:13 am
This was possible because the habeas statute permits a prisoner to bring a petition before “any” superior court judge. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 11:57 am
A federal appellate court in Narayanan et al. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
”Citing Harlow v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 7:07 am
Johnstone, 2013 FC 113 (31 January) and Canadian National Railway v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:25 pm
[FN20] Citations to Johnston and Anderson's-Black Rock show similar patterns. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Several lower court decisions had done so explicitly: Overton v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 8:24 am
Johnstone v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm
K M Imports Inc. (2014 ONSC 1889) the Ontario Superior Court of Justice awarded a company which imports Caribbean food into Canada libel damages of Can$50,000. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:51 am
Johnston, [1970] 2 O.R. 1 (H.C.J.). [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
Johnston did not follow the holding in this case. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:31 am
DC Gow indicated that she would discuss matters with her superior officer but that a search warrant might be sought.[5] On 11 July 2016, in anticipation that an application for a warrant might be made, Mr Watson, on behalf of S wrote to the Sheriff Clerk in Edinburgh requesting that the Sheriff Clerk contact the complainers in the event of any application to the sheriff with a view to S being represented at any hearing before the sheriff. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm
Messier, 2014 QCCS 357 (judgment in French) the Quebec Superior Court awarded Can$5,000 moral damages and Can$5,000 punitive damages in respect of defamatory allegations published on the internet. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 6:20 am
They prevailed before a three-judge panel of the superior court in Wake County and the matter is now before the state supreme court. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
In Unum Group v. [read post]
