Search for: "Joint Motion for Parties' Proposed Briefing Schedule"
Results 21 - 40
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2009, 3:29 am
I will also post a schedule of the timing contemplated by the Rules in a table format, but for now here are highlights of the significant changes between the Proposed Rules and the Rules as enacted yesterday: Some of the more significant changes the Court made from the Proposed Rules to the LPR as enacted: Early Dispositive Motions (LPR 1.1 & 6.1): A statement was added in LPR 1.1 that the Court may defer any… [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 10:58 am
If the settlement becomes final, then the parties will jointly move the Court for voluntary dismissal; otherwise the parties will propose a resumed briefing schedule and ask the Court to restore the case to the argument calendar. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 6:32 am
In their joint motion, the parties proposed to the court that the case be briefed in November through February, with the petitioners' brief due on November 30, 2010 and the SEC's brief due on January 19, 2011. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 5:57 am
She went on to explain Hadi’s pain medication schedule. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 11:23 am
The Patent Rules are scheduled such that a patent trial should occur within two years of serving the complaint. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:40 am
A supplemental Judgment of Divorce established that the Wife would have sole physical custody and the parties would share joint legal custody. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:00 am
Any proposed claim constructions shall be included in the parties’ summary judgment briefs – no separate briefs will be accepted. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 10:52 am
” Following the remand, the CFPB and All American filed a joint motion asking the district court to set a briefing schedule. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 3:38 am
Interestingly, a comment was made at the session pointing out that the Court has not decided how to schedule briefing when both parties assert patents against each other, that is, when each party is a patent holder and each party is an accused infringer. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 4:13 am
Following up on posts analyzing the Northern District's Local Patent Rules over the last several weeks (click here (for analysis of the Rules, here (for a comparison of the enacted Rules to the Proposed Rules) and here (arguing that the Rules will increase patent litigations in the Northern District of Illinois) for those posts and here for a copy of the Rules), I have prepared the following chart laying out the schedule… [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 8:54 am
Proposed schedule for trial: Parties are to submit a proposed schedule for the use of trial time. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 8:54 am
Proposed schedule for trial: Parties are to submit a proposed schedule for the use of trial time. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 12:12 pm
The parties are directed to file a joint proposed amended scheduling order by December 13, 2022. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 10:56 am
” Judge Kelly also ordered the parties to “meet and confer, and submit, by December 1, 2017, a joint proposed schedule for briefing the merits and/or for briefing a preliminary injunction, should one be filed by Plaintiff by then” and submit separate proposed schedules if no agreement on a joint proposed schedule is reached. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 6:40 am
The parties have a "meeting of the parties" to prepare a joint proposal to the federal judge with the deadlines and schedule of what will happen in the case. 7. [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:09 am
Also, to date, the parties have briefed in writing some 216 substantive motions and have orally argued some 50 motions. [read post]
16 May 2011, 12:10 pm
” Guardians and FWS said they would not oppose CBD being sllowed to comment on the agreement as amicus curiae, or friend of the court, “provided CBD is able to move for such leave in a timely manner so as to avoid any significant disruption to the current briefing schedule for the Joint Motion for Approval. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
After brief discussions of logistical problems—power outages for lawyers’ trailers—the parties went to work on the substantive issues. 502 Issues Both the government and Hawsawi asked Monday morning to litigate a feature of Hawsawi’s personal jurisdiction defenses. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 8:43 am
Where an issue cannot be reduced to a one-word statement or check-box, the parties are asked to provide facts (“The parenting schedule I propose is:”) not explanations (“I am asking for this parenting schedule because:”). [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 10:16 am
As a result, Sullivan may continue with his original plan to consider the Justice Department’s motion, which includes the appointment of Gleeson as amicus, adversarial briefing from the parties and the holding of a hearing. [read post]
