Search for: "Jonathan S. Smith" Results 21 - 40 of 1,070
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm by renholding
Consistent with this agency’s disclosure rules over the decades, today’s final rules are grounded in materiality. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 11:52 am by John Carroll, Joy Siu and Jake Walker
Here are key takeaways from the workshop: The Agencies remain skeptical of private equity’s increasing investments in the health care industry. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 3:06 am by jonathanturley
The Supreme Court previously rejected Smiths arguments that the urgency of trying Trump should override the ordinary appellate process or schedule. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 8:26 am by Jonathan H. Adler
It has ordered expedited briefing (although not quite as expedited as special counsel Jack Smith requested), and we can hope for a decision before the end of June. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Gene Takagi
Stay informed of the week’s notable events and shared resources with this curated list of Nonprofit Resources of the Week. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:04 am by jonathanturley
During the recent Trump appeal in Washington, there was also a claim that Special Counsel Jack Smiths work was unconstitutional, though the challenge was based on the absence of an authorizing statute. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Alex Laar (Oxford), ‘Sir Thomas Smiths Legal Annotations’ (with rare books viewing). [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
A contextual example of Appellant's reliance on fictitious authority includes: For instance, in Smith v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm by Mark Walsh
Seated separately in the bar section is Michael Dreeben, an SG’s office veteran who is working for Special Counsel Jack Smith on the criminal prosecution of Trump over Jan. 6. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
When Trump’s attorney Jonathan Mitchell was questioned, none of the justices asked about whether Trump’s actions constituted an insurrection until Jackson raised it in her final question. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  (And the fact that Trump’s counsel Jonathan Mitchell doesn’t make any effort to defend this argument should tell you something about its prospects.) [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Democratic Groups File Complaints in an Attempt to Find Out MSN – Brian Slodysko and Jonathan Cooper (Associated Press) | Published: 1/24/2024 For months, the centrist group No Labels has stockpiled cash and diligently worked to secure ballot access for a potential third-party presidential bid, striking fear among allies of President Biden that the effort could siphon away votes and hand the White House to Donald Trump. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 10:30 am by Sherica Celine
Watch this EEOC investigations and determinations video by Amanda Brown of Reed Smith LLP. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 9:03 pm by renholding
Accordingly, today’s final rules will remove safe harbor protections[1] and add additional disclosure requirements for projections used in association with de-SPAC transactions. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
California – DWP Board President Is Out Amid Ethics Questions, Power Struggle at Utility MSN – Dakota Smith (Los Angeles Times) | Published: 1/9/2024 Cynthia McClain-Hill will step down as president of the Los Angeles Board of Water and Power Commission following ethics-related complaints involving her and growing tensions over the utility’s leadership. [read post]