Search for: "Jones v. Banks"
Results 21 - 40
of 867
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
The California state law at issue in Flagstar Bank v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 1:06 am
Therefore, laws vary state by state.The legal differences between the U.S. states became evident in a lawsuit from 2011 between a celebrity photographer and Marilyn Monroe’s estate (Greene Archives v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 6:05 am
Jones before the Supreme Court on behalf of the United States.) [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:08 am
” Jones v 636 Holding Corp., 73 AD3d 409, 409 (1st Dept. 2010); see Landis v 383 Realty Corp., 175 AD3d 1207, 1207 (1st Dept. 2019). [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 6:07 am
The Court also provides interesting analysis on what constitutes an adverse action under Title VII.The case is Banks v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
Wachovia Bank, Nat’l Ass’n v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Haywood v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am
Byers and others v Saudi National Bank, heard 12th July 2023. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 10:59 am
In Jones Lange LaSalle Brokerage, Inc. v. 1441 L Associates, LLC, No. 22-046, JLL represented both parties to an agreement to lease property in northwest Washington, DC. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
” Before the nation’s major investment banks knew it, half the states had adopted a similar one by 1913. [read post]
18 May 2023, 8:01 am
Jones, involving class-action settlements. [read post]
13 May 2023, 7:59 am
Bank National Association v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 9:32 am
City of NY, 105 F Supp 3d 369, 379 [SDNY 2015] "[T]he First Amendment goes beyond protection of the press and the self-expression of individuals to prohibit government from limiting the stock of information from which members of the public may draw" quoting First Nat'l Bank of Bos v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
3 May 2023, 10:50 am
Jérémie Gilbert, Elizabeth Macpherson, Emily Jones, & Julia Dehm, The Rights of Nature as a Legal Response to the Global Environmental Crisis? [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 3:48 am
Republicans on Thursday voted to kick out Jones and fellow Democrat Justin Pearson. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 1:47 pm
Jones that “[o]ur freedoms to engage in various activities also include the freedom not to do so. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:08 am
Lira v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 1:45 am
Jones v Birmingham City Council and another, heard 30th-31st January 2023. [read post]