Search for: "Jones v. Chandler" Results 21 - 35 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2012, 10:50 pm
A discussion of the case of Jonesv- Jones, which involved the treatment by the Court of Appeal of a business which began before the marriage but significantly increased in value during it. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
On 6 November 2019 Nicklin J heard the assessment of damages in the case of Chandler v O’Connor. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
  Judgment was handed down on 22 November 2019 On 22 November 2019 Nicklin J handed down judgment in the case of Chandler v O’Connor [2019] EWHC 3181 (QB). [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
 On 17 May 2018 there was a statement in open court in the case of Chandler v Another Europe is Possible Limited. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:42 am by Matthew Scarola
” Finally, David Kopel argues in the Washington Times that Justice Sotomayor’s recent dissent in McDonald v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Bowers, Frederick Boyce, Chris Boyd, Heather Boyer, Kent Boyer, Dennis Boyle, Carl Brackpool, Jon Bradley, Darin Brannan, Aaron Bratrude, Rich Braun, Michael Breault, John Brehm, Chuck Brennan, Craig Brenner, Will Briegel, Ludy Brito, Paul Chandler Britton, Jeannine Broadwell, David Brogden, Sean Brophy, Brady Brosnahan, David Brouda, Hilary Brown, Kayenta Brown, Matthew Brown, Monika Brown, Roger L. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Chandler, No. 07-1583 A conviction and sentence pursuant to a guilty plea to drug related charges are affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) the conversion of cash to a drug quantity; 2) a failure to apply the 18 U.S.C. section 3553(a) factors; 3) ineffective assistance of counsel; and 4) a retroactive revision to sentencing guidelines for crack cocaine. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:11 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
They asked the Delaware Chancery Court to review the “entire fairness” of the transaction, per Kahn v. [read post]