Search for: "Jones v. City of Seattle"
Results 21 - 40
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Allen); City of Charleston v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 10:53 am
In Gersh v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:49 am
The Tri-City Herald editorial board adds its voice to those advocating that oral arguments be televised. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:04 am
Americans United Inc. (1974), and Bob Jones Univ. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 5:55 pm
While voters have rejected public financing of stadiums in San Jose, Milwaukee, and Seattle in ballot initiatives, those teams were still able to obtain new stadiums. [31] V. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 1:37 pm
City of Seattle, 387 U.S. 541, 87 S.Ct. 1737 (1967); Go-Bart Importing Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Sudbury, MA Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2005. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(ipeg) (IP Watch) Holding up products at EU borders using patents (ipeg) Improving the links between ESOs and the European Patent Office (IP:JUR) General Court affirms earlier Board of Appeal's decision that "James Jones" is confusingly similar to "JACK & JONES", in connection with clothing in Class 25 (Class 46) Clutter on the Community Trademark Register (SOLO Independent IP Practitioners) No strange aroma, but will Longkou Fen Si pass the test? [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(ipeg) (IP Watch) Holding up products at EU borders using patents (ipeg) Improving the links between ESOs and the European Patent Office (IP:JUR) General Court affirms earlier Board of Appeal's decision that "James Jones" is confusingly similar to "JACK & JONES", in connection with clothing in Class 25 (Class 46) Clutter on the Community Trademark Register (SOLO Independent IP Practitioners) No strange aroma, but will Longkou Fen Si pass the test? [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 4:02 pm
The family of Stanley-Jones agreed to an $8.25 million settlement with the city of Detroit. [read post]
13 May 2023, 7:59 am
Jones 22-982Issue: Whether the U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 3:02 am
McCrary, 427 U.S. 160 (1976); Jones v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:23 am
Schwarzenegger (now Perry v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EPO: Should green technology be subject to compulsory licensing? [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Antkowiak (Seattle), Samuel P. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
City of Memphis, No. 08-744T VII (Ed. - According to Public Citizen, the issues appear similar to Ricci, above)Ø SCOTUS docket hereBaxter v. [read post]
